Fifty years of irrelevance: The wild goose chase of management science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: to begin to understand the reasons for the spectacular failure of management research to create relevant results in the period 1960-2010. Research Questions: How relevant is management science/management research? How was the 1959 change of direction in management science to social science justified and achieved? Which correctives have been proposed for management research? What can be said about the reasons for irrelevance of management research? Research Method: Literature study Findings: the ousting of production from management science in 1959 seems to have been a major contributing factor to irrelevance across managerial sub-disciplines. The two 1959 reports (by Pierson and Gordon & Howell) on the future of business education failed to give appropriate direction for management research; in spite of extensive (although somewhat myopic) discussion on irrelevance in the management scholar community from circa 1980 onwards, there has been little corrective action. Limitations: this is a broad brush examination.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-11
Number of pages11
JournalLean Construction Journal
Volume2011
Issue numberSpecial Issue
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Management science
Social sciences
Brushes
Education

Cite this

@article{fa81570f1b5d420e80a20c7b2202b12e,
title = "Fifty years of irrelevance: The wild goose chase of management science",
abstract = "Purpose: to begin to understand the reasons for the spectacular failure of management research to create relevant results in the period 1960-2010. Research Questions: How relevant is management science/management research? How was the 1959 change of direction in management science to social science justified and achieved? Which correctives have been proposed for management research? What can be said about the reasons for irrelevance of management research? Research Method: Literature study Findings: the ousting of production from management science in 1959 seems to have been a major contributing factor to irrelevance across managerial sub-disciplines. The two 1959 reports (by Pierson and Gordon & Howell) on the future of business education failed to give appropriate direction for management research; in spite of extensive (although somewhat myopic) discussion on irrelevance in the management scholar community from circa 1980 onwards, there has been little corrective action. Limitations: this is a broad brush examination.",
keywords = "Irrelevance, Management science",
author = "Lauri Koskela",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2011",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Lean Construction Journal",
issn = "1555-1369",
publisher = "Dipartimento di Filosofia e Beni Culturali, Universita Ca' Foscari",
number = "Special Issue",

}

Fifty years of irrelevance : The wild goose chase of management science. / Koskela, Lauri.

In: Lean Construction Journal, Vol. 2011, No. Special Issue, 01.01.2011, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fifty years of irrelevance

T2 - Lean Construction Journal

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: to begin to understand the reasons for the spectacular failure of management research to create relevant results in the period 1960-2010. Research Questions: How relevant is management science/management research? How was the 1959 change of direction in management science to social science justified and achieved? Which correctives have been proposed for management research? What can be said about the reasons for irrelevance of management research? Research Method: Literature study Findings: the ousting of production from management science in 1959 seems to have been a major contributing factor to irrelevance across managerial sub-disciplines. The two 1959 reports (by Pierson and Gordon & Howell) on the future of business education failed to give appropriate direction for management research; in spite of extensive (although somewhat myopic) discussion on irrelevance in the management scholar community from circa 1980 onwards, there has been little corrective action. Limitations: this is a broad brush examination.

AB - Purpose: to begin to understand the reasons for the spectacular failure of management research to create relevant results in the period 1960-2010. Research Questions: How relevant is management science/management research? How was the 1959 change of direction in management science to social science justified and achieved? Which correctives have been proposed for management research? What can be said about the reasons for irrelevance of management research? Research Method: Literature study Findings: the ousting of production from management science in 1959 seems to have been a major contributing factor to irrelevance across managerial sub-disciplines. The two 1959 reports (by Pierson and Gordon & Howell) on the future of business education failed to give appropriate direction for management research; in spite of extensive (although somewhat myopic) discussion on irrelevance in the management scholar community from circa 1980 onwards, there has been little corrective action. Limitations: this is a broad brush examination.

KW - Irrelevance

KW - Management science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884613610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2011

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Lean Construction Journal

JF - Lean Construction Journal

SN - 1555-1369

IS - Special Issue

ER -