Fools, jesters and the possibility of responsible leadership

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The vibrant academic and practitioner conversation about corporate responsibility does not appear to reduce the number of scandals involving unethical managerial behaviour. This leaves the question of whether responsible organisational leadership is possible. Some leadership scholars recently suggested that understanding leadership as a relational process can facilitate more responsible leadership practice. This article develops the relational leadership perspective by offering a critical discussion of the possibility of responsible relational leadership. I construct an understanding of responsibility following the writings of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. I then use the archetypal figure of the Fool as an imaginary device to translate Levinasian and Derridian ethics into lived experiences and thus illuminate the conditions under which responsibility may be possibilised. This theoretical analysis exposes the irresolvable tension between responsibility and the relational in leadership but also identifies ways through which leadership actors can strive for responsibility through purposefully engaging with the tension.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalOrganization
Early online date7 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Responsible leadership
Responsibility
Relational leadership
Scandal
Managerial behavior
Corporate responsibility
Theoretical analysis

Cite this

@article{bfbfa736214a41e2a5e66bf766b9d167,
title = "Fools, jesters and the possibility of responsible leadership",
abstract = "The vibrant academic and practitioner conversation about corporate responsibility does not appear to reduce the number of scandals involving unethical managerial behaviour. This leaves the question of whether responsible organisational leadership is possible. Some leadership scholars recently suggested that understanding leadership as a relational process can facilitate more responsible leadership practice. This article develops the relational leadership perspective by offering a critical discussion of the possibility of responsible relational leadership. I construct an understanding of responsibility following the writings of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. I then use the archetypal figure of the Fool as an imaginary device to translate Levinasian and Derridian ethics into lived experiences and thus illuminate the conditions under which responsibility may be possibilised. This theoretical analysis exposes the irresolvable tension between responsibility and the relational in leadership but also identifies ways through which leadership actors can strive for responsibility through purposefully engaging with the tension.",
keywords = "Responsible leadership, Archetypes, The Fool, Derrida, Levinas, Aporia",
author = "Anna Zueva-Owens",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1350508419831919",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Fools, jesters and the possibility of responsible leadership. / Zueva-Owens, Anna.

In: Organization, 07.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fools, jesters and the possibility of responsible leadership

AU - Zueva-Owens, Anna

PY - 2019/3/7

Y1 - 2019/3/7

N2 - The vibrant academic and practitioner conversation about corporate responsibility does not appear to reduce the number of scandals involving unethical managerial behaviour. This leaves the question of whether responsible organisational leadership is possible. Some leadership scholars recently suggested that understanding leadership as a relational process can facilitate more responsible leadership practice. This article develops the relational leadership perspective by offering a critical discussion of the possibility of responsible relational leadership. I construct an understanding of responsibility following the writings of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. I then use the archetypal figure of the Fool as an imaginary device to translate Levinasian and Derridian ethics into lived experiences and thus illuminate the conditions under which responsibility may be possibilised. This theoretical analysis exposes the irresolvable tension between responsibility and the relational in leadership but also identifies ways through which leadership actors can strive for responsibility through purposefully engaging with the tension.

AB - The vibrant academic and practitioner conversation about corporate responsibility does not appear to reduce the number of scandals involving unethical managerial behaviour. This leaves the question of whether responsible organisational leadership is possible. Some leadership scholars recently suggested that understanding leadership as a relational process can facilitate more responsible leadership practice. This article develops the relational leadership perspective by offering a critical discussion of the possibility of responsible relational leadership. I construct an understanding of responsibility following the writings of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. I then use the archetypal figure of the Fool as an imaginary device to translate Levinasian and Derridian ethics into lived experiences and thus illuminate the conditions under which responsibility may be possibilised. This theoretical analysis exposes the irresolvable tension between responsibility and the relational in leadership but also identifies ways through which leadership actors can strive for responsibility through purposefully engaging with the tension.

KW - Responsible leadership

KW - Archetypes

KW - The Fool

KW - Derrida

KW - Levinas

KW - Aporia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062676235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1350508419831919

DO - 10.1177/1350508419831919

M3 - Article

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

ER -