‘Freedom Through Marketing’ Is Not Doublespeak

Haseeb Shabbir, Michael R. Hyman, Dianne Dean, Stephan Dahl

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The articles comprising this thematic symposium suggest options for exploring the nexus between freedom and unfreedom, as exemplified by the British abolitionists’ anti-slavery campaign and the paradox of freedom. Each article has implications for how these abolitionists achieved their goals, social activists’ efforts to secure reparations for slave ancestors, and modern slavery (e.g., human trafficking). We present the abolitionists’ undertaking as a marketing campaign, highlighting the role of instilling moral agency and indignation through re-humanizing the dehumanized. Despite this campaign’s eventual success, its post-emancipation phase illustrates a paradox of freedom. After introducing mystification as an explanation for the obscuring rhetoric used to conceal post-emancipation violations of freedom during the West’s colonial phase, we briefly discuss the appropriateness of reparations. Finally, we discuss the contributions made by the articles in this thematic symposium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-241
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume164
Issue number2
Early online date10 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Freedom Through Marketing’ Is Not Doublespeak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this