Fully automating fine-optics manufacture - why so tough, and what are we doing?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Precision and ultra-precision surfaces are crucial for many products – quality optics, joint & cranial implants, turbine blades, and industrial moulds & dies, to name a few. Automation in this context is distinct from standard procedures in industry, where the identical sequence of operations can be repeated over and over again. Ultraprecision tolerances may be tens to hundreds of times tighter, and this is compounded by the hundreds of diverse substrate materials in use. Even with modern computer numerically controlled (CNC) machines, skilled craftspeople are needed to plan a process-chain for a new material or geometry. Processes working at these tight tolerances, fall short of being fully-deterministic, so repeated process-metrology iterations are required. Surface-correction loops may be automated, but expert assessment should be performed at each step to check for unexpected anomalies. The ultimate goal of importing a part, processing autonomously, and delivering a finished part to an “optical” specification with no human intervention, is still a long way off. This paper describes the challenge and why it is important. It then melds together process-monitoring, psychology, artificial intelligence and robotics, to take a far-sighted view of how the ultimate goal can be realised.

Original languageEnglish
Article number24
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the European Optical Society
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date4 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

optics
psychology
artificial intelligence
turbine blades
automation
robotics
metrology
iteration
specifications
industries
anomalies
products
geometry

Cite this

@article{7b502c4ebabd431ea798548275f9060d,
title = "Fully automating fine-optics manufacture - why so tough, and what are we doing?",
abstract = "Precision and ultra-precision surfaces are crucial for many products – quality optics, joint & cranial implants, turbine blades, and industrial moulds & dies, to name a few. Automation in this context is distinct from standard procedures in industry, where the identical sequence of operations can be repeated over and over again. Ultraprecision tolerances may be tens to hundreds of times tighter, and this is compounded by the hundreds of diverse substrate materials in use. Even with modern computer numerically controlled (CNC) machines, skilled craftspeople are needed to plan a process-chain for a new material or geometry. Processes working at these tight tolerances, fall short of being fully-deterministic, so repeated process-metrology iterations are required. Surface-correction loops may be automated, but expert assessment should be performed at each step to check for unexpected anomalies. The ultimate goal of importing a part, processing autonomously, and delivering a finished part to an “optical” specification with no human intervention, is still a long way off. This paper describes the challenge and why it is important. It then melds together process-monitoring, psychology, artificial intelligence and robotics, to take a far-sighted view of how the ultimate goal can be realised.",
keywords = "Artificial-intelligence, Automated, Autonomous, Manufacturing, Optics, Polishing, Surfaces",
author = "Walker, {David Douglas} and McCluskey, {Thomas Leo} and Guoyu Yu and Sanja Petrovic and Hongyu Li",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s41476-019-0119-y",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of the European Optical Society",
issn = "1990-2573",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fully automating fine-optics manufacture - why so tough, and what are we doing?

AU - Walker, David Douglas

AU - McCluskey, Thomas Leo

AU - Yu, Guoyu

AU - Petrovic, Sanja

AU - Li, Hongyu

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Precision and ultra-precision surfaces are crucial for many products – quality optics, joint & cranial implants, turbine blades, and industrial moulds & dies, to name a few. Automation in this context is distinct from standard procedures in industry, where the identical sequence of operations can be repeated over and over again. Ultraprecision tolerances may be tens to hundreds of times tighter, and this is compounded by the hundreds of diverse substrate materials in use. Even with modern computer numerically controlled (CNC) machines, skilled craftspeople are needed to plan a process-chain for a new material or geometry. Processes working at these tight tolerances, fall short of being fully-deterministic, so repeated process-metrology iterations are required. Surface-correction loops may be automated, but expert assessment should be performed at each step to check for unexpected anomalies. The ultimate goal of importing a part, processing autonomously, and delivering a finished part to an “optical” specification with no human intervention, is still a long way off. This paper describes the challenge and why it is important. It then melds together process-monitoring, psychology, artificial intelligence and robotics, to take a far-sighted view of how the ultimate goal can be realised.

AB - Precision and ultra-precision surfaces are crucial for many products – quality optics, joint & cranial implants, turbine blades, and industrial moulds & dies, to name a few. Automation in this context is distinct from standard procedures in industry, where the identical sequence of operations can be repeated over and over again. Ultraprecision tolerances may be tens to hundreds of times tighter, and this is compounded by the hundreds of diverse substrate materials in use. Even with modern computer numerically controlled (CNC) machines, skilled craftspeople are needed to plan a process-chain for a new material or geometry. Processes working at these tight tolerances, fall short of being fully-deterministic, so repeated process-metrology iterations are required. Surface-correction loops may be automated, but expert assessment should be performed at each step to check for unexpected anomalies. The ultimate goal of importing a part, processing autonomously, and delivering a finished part to an “optical” specification with no human intervention, is still a long way off. This paper describes the challenge and why it is important. It then melds together process-monitoring, psychology, artificial intelligence and robotics, to take a far-sighted view of how the ultimate goal can be realised.

KW - Artificial-intelligence

KW - Automated

KW - Autonomous

KW - Manufacturing

KW - Optics

KW - Polishing

KW - Surfaces

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074719826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s41476-019-0119-y

DO - 10.1186/s41476-019-0119-y

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Journal of the European Optical Society

JF - Journal of the European Optical Society

SN - 1990-2573

IS - 1

M1 - 24

ER -