Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing

Richard J. Cooper, Paul Bissell, Paul Ward, Elizabeth Murphy, Claire Anderson, Tony Avery, Veronica James, Jo Lymn, Louise Guillaume, Allen Hutchinson, Julie Ratcliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Doctors have traditionally been viewed as the dominant healthcare profession, with the authority to prescribe medicines, but recent non-medical prescribing initiatives have been viewed as possible challenges to such dominance. Using the example of the introduction of supplementary prescribing in the UK, this study sought to explore whether such initiatives represent a challenge to medical authority. Ten case study sites in England involving primary and secondary care and a range of clinical areas were used to undertake a total of 77 observations of supplementary prescribing consultations and interviews with 28 patients, 11 doctors and nurse and pharmacist prescribers at each site.

Supplementary prescribing was viewed positively by all participants but several doctors and patients appeared to lack awareness and understanding of supplementary prescribing. Continued medical authority was supported empirically in five areas: patients’ and supplementary prescribers’ perception of doctors as being hierarchically superior; doctors legitimation of nurses’ and pharmacists’ prescribing initially; doctors’ belief that they could control (particularly nurses’) access to prescribing training; supplementary prescribers’ frequent recourse to use doctors’ advice, coupled with doctors’ encouragement of such ‘knock on door’ prescribing advice policies; doctors’ denigration of most routine prescribing but claims that diagnosis was more skilled and key to medicine.

Supplementary prescribing appeared to be successfully accomplished in practice in a range of clinical settings and was acceptable to all involved but did not ultimately challenge medical dominance. However, more recent nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing (involving diagnosis) may represent a more significant threat.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-133
Number of pages19
JournalHealth
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pharmacist
Pharmacists
nurse
Nurses
medicine
Secondary Care
legitimation
recourse
England
Primary Health Care
Referral and Consultation
profession
Medicine
Interviews
threat
Delivery of Health Care
lack
interview

Cite this

Cooper, R. J., Bissell, P., Ward, P., Murphy, E., Anderson, C., Avery, T., ... Ratcliffe, J. (2012). Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing. Health, 16(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459310364159
Cooper, Richard J. ; Bissell, Paul ; Ward, Paul ; Murphy, Elizabeth ; Anderson, Claire ; Avery, Tony ; James, Veronica ; Lymn, Jo ; Guillaume, Louise ; Hutchinson, Allen ; Ratcliffe, Julie. / Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing. In: Health. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 115-133.
@article{f34789eb09574bc29cf71ec9f30adddd,
title = "Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing",
abstract = "Doctors have traditionally been viewed as the dominant healthcare profession, with the authority to prescribe medicines, but recent non-medical prescribing initiatives have been viewed as possible challenges to such dominance. Using the example of the introduction of supplementary prescribing in the UK, this study sought to explore whether such initiatives represent a challenge to medical authority. Ten case study sites in England involving primary and secondary care and a range of clinical areas were used to undertake a total of 77 observations of supplementary prescribing consultations and interviews with 28 patients, 11 doctors and nurse and pharmacist prescribers at each site.Supplementary prescribing was viewed positively by all participants but several doctors and patients appeared to lack awareness and understanding of supplementary prescribing. Continued medical authority was supported empirically in five areas: patients’ and supplementary prescribers’ perception of doctors as being hierarchically superior; doctors legitimation of nurses’ and pharmacists’ prescribing initially; doctors’ belief that they could control (particularly nurses’) access to prescribing training; supplementary prescribers’ frequent recourse to use doctors’ advice, coupled with doctors’ encouragement of such ‘knock on door’ prescribing advice policies; doctors’ denigration of most routine prescribing but claims that diagnosis was more skilled and key to medicine.Supplementary prescribing appeared to be successfully accomplished in practice in a range of clinical settings and was acceptable to all involved but did not ultimately challenge medical dominance. However, more recent nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing (involving diagnosis) may represent a more significant threat.",
keywords = "Organization of health services, Patient-physician relationship, Profession, Professionalization",
author = "Cooper, {Richard J.} and Paul Bissell and Paul Ward and Elizabeth Murphy and Claire Anderson and Tony Avery and Veronica James and Jo Lymn and Louise Guillaume and Allen Hutchinson and Julie Ratcliffe",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1363459310364159",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "115--133",
journal = "Health (United Kingdom)",
issn = "1363-4593",
publisher = "Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England",
number = "2",

}

Cooper, RJ, Bissell, P, Ward, P, Murphy, E, Anderson, C, Avery, T, James, V, Lymn, J, Guillaume, L, Hutchinson, A & Ratcliffe, J 2012, 'Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing', Health, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459310364159

Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing. / Cooper, Richard J.; Bissell, Paul; Ward, Paul; Murphy, Elizabeth; Anderson, Claire; Avery, Tony; James, Veronica; Lymn, Jo; Guillaume, Louise; Hutchinson, Allen; Ratcliffe, Julie.

In: Health, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012, p. 115-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing

AU - Cooper, Richard J.

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Ward, Paul

AU - Murphy, Elizabeth

AU - Anderson, Claire

AU - Avery, Tony

AU - James, Veronica

AU - Lymn, Jo

AU - Guillaume, Louise

AU - Hutchinson, Allen

AU - Ratcliffe, Julie

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Doctors have traditionally been viewed as the dominant healthcare profession, with the authority to prescribe medicines, but recent non-medical prescribing initiatives have been viewed as possible challenges to such dominance. Using the example of the introduction of supplementary prescribing in the UK, this study sought to explore whether such initiatives represent a challenge to medical authority. Ten case study sites in England involving primary and secondary care and a range of clinical areas were used to undertake a total of 77 observations of supplementary prescribing consultations and interviews with 28 patients, 11 doctors and nurse and pharmacist prescribers at each site.Supplementary prescribing was viewed positively by all participants but several doctors and patients appeared to lack awareness and understanding of supplementary prescribing. Continued medical authority was supported empirically in five areas: patients’ and supplementary prescribers’ perception of doctors as being hierarchically superior; doctors legitimation of nurses’ and pharmacists’ prescribing initially; doctors’ belief that they could control (particularly nurses’) access to prescribing training; supplementary prescribers’ frequent recourse to use doctors’ advice, coupled with doctors’ encouragement of such ‘knock on door’ prescribing advice policies; doctors’ denigration of most routine prescribing but claims that diagnosis was more skilled and key to medicine.Supplementary prescribing appeared to be successfully accomplished in practice in a range of clinical settings and was acceptable to all involved but did not ultimately challenge medical dominance. However, more recent nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing (involving diagnosis) may represent a more significant threat.

AB - Doctors have traditionally been viewed as the dominant healthcare profession, with the authority to prescribe medicines, but recent non-medical prescribing initiatives have been viewed as possible challenges to such dominance. Using the example of the introduction of supplementary prescribing in the UK, this study sought to explore whether such initiatives represent a challenge to medical authority. Ten case study sites in England involving primary and secondary care and a range of clinical areas were used to undertake a total of 77 observations of supplementary prescribing consultations and interviews with 28 patients, 11 doctors and nurse and pharmacist prescribers at each site.Supplementary prescribing was viewed positively by all participants but several doctors and patients appeared to lack awareness and understanding of supplementary prescribing. Continued medical authority was supported empirically in five areas: patients’ and supplementary prescribers’ perception of doctors as being hierarchically superior; doctors legitimation of nurses’ and pharmacists’ prescribing initially; doctors’ belief that they could control (particularly nurses’) access to prescribing training; supplementary prescribers’ frequent recourse to use doctors’ advice, coupled with doctors’ encouragement of such ‘knock on door’ prescribing advice policies; doctors’ denigration of most routine prescribing but claims that diagnosis was more skilled and key to medicine.Supplementary prescribing appeared to be successfully accomplished in practice in a range of clinical settings and was acceptable to all involved but did not ultimately challenge medical dominance. However, more recent nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing (involving diagnosis) may represent a more significant threat.

KW - Organization of health services

KW - Patient-physician relationship

KW - Profession

KW - Professionalization

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/hea

U2 - 10.1177/1363459310364159

DO - 10.1177/1363459310364159

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 115

EP - 133

JO - Health (United Kingdom)

JF - Health (United Kingdom)

SN - 1363-4593

IS - 2

ER -