Further insights into the construct of criminal social identity: validation of a revised measure in a prison population

Daniel Boduszek, Agata Debowska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study objective was to develop a revised version of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity (MCSI) with an increased number of indicators to more reliably capture three MCSI dimensions. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised (MCSI-R) was examined among a sample of systematically selected inmates (N = 2192). Four competing models of the MCSI-R were specified and tested using Mplus with weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment estimation. Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (cognitive centrality, in-group affect and in-group ties) while controlling for the general factor was the best fit for the data. Good composite reliability of the three MCSI-R dimensions was established. The three subscales of the MCSI-R evidence differential predictive utility for prisonization, number of incarcerations, self-esteem and violent offending. Practical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages694-710
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume28
Issue number5
Early online date17 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Prisons
Population
Social Adjustment
Least-Squares Analysis
Self Concept

Cite this

@article{d6d8a39d77854c0dae04f58aa20e86cd,
title = "Further insights into the construct of criminal social identity: validation of a revised measure in a prison population",
abstract = "The current study objective was to develop a revised version of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity (MCSI) with an increased number of indicators to more reliably capture three MCSI dimensions. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised (MCSI-R) was examined among a sample of systematically selected inmates (N = 2192). Four competing models of the MCSI-R were specified and tested using Mplus with weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment estimation. Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (cognitive centrality, in-group affect and in-group ties) while controlling for the general factor was the best fit for the data. Good composite reliability of the three MCSI-R dimensions was established. The three subscales of the MCSI-R evidence differential predictive utility for prisonization, number of incarcerations, self-esteem and violent offending. Practical implications and directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "bifactor modelling, Criminal social identity, prison population, the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised",
author = "Daniel Boduszek and Agata Debowska",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14789949.2017.1318161",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "694--710",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology",
issn = "1478-9949",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further insights into the construct of criminal social identity

T2 - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Debowska, Agata

PY - 2017/9/3

Y1 - 2017/9/3

N2 - The current study objective was to develop a revised version of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity (MCSI) with an increased number of indicators to more reliably capture three MCSI dimensions. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised (MCSI-R) was examined among a sample of systematically selected inmates (N = 2192). Four competing models of the MCSI-R were specified and tested using Mplus with weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment estimation. Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (cognitive centrality, in-group affect and in-group ties) while controlling for the general factor was the best fit for the data. Good composite reliability of the three MCSI-R dimensions was established. The three subscales of the MCSI-R evidence differential predictive utility for prisonization, number of incarcerations, self-esteem and violent offending. Practical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

AB - The current study objective was to develop a revised version of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity (MCSI) with an increased number of indicators to more reliably capture three MCSI dimensions. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised (MCSI-R) was examined among a sample of systematically selected inmates (N = 2192). Four competing models of the MCSI-R were specified and tested using Mplus with weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment estimation. Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (cognitive centrality, in-group affect and in-group ties) while controlling for the general factor was the best fit for the data. Good composite reliability of the three MCSI-R dimensions was established. The three subscales of the MCSI-R evidence differential predictive utility for prisonization, number of incarcerations, self-esteem and violent offending. Practical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

KW - bifactor modelling

KW - Criminal social identity

KW - prison population

KW - the Measure of Criminal Social Identity–Revised

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017579436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1318161

DO - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1318161

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 694

EP - 710

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

SN - 1478-9949

IS - 5

ER -