Gender Differences in Risk and Protective factors for Resolved Plans and Preparations for Suicide among University Students

Katie Dhingra, Agata Debowska, Daniel Boduszek, Parveen Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Identifying the psychological predictors of suicide risk is essential because these variables may be amenable to change in treatment, unlike demographic or historical factors. Aims. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of past two-week suicidal ideation for males and females separately. Method. Participants were 1184 healthy adults who completed an online survey. Results. A significant association between suicidal ideation and gender was found, such that mean levels were significantly higher in females than males. Separate regression analyses accounted for significant amounts of variance in suicide ideation, 54% for males and 68% for females. Moreover, the analyses revealed that suicide resilience Factor 2 (Emotional Stability) was a protective factor for both males and females; however, defeat, goal disengagement, and depression were independently associated with suicide ideation in males but not females. By contrast, entrapment, perceived burdensomeness, and hopelessness Factor 3 (Future Expectations) were significant risk factors only in females. Conclusions. The findings have clinical and practical implications, which may guide future practice, and supports the notion of targeted prevention and intervention strategies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
JournalSuicidology Online
Volume7
Issue number10
Early online date27 Nov 2016
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Suicide
Students
Suicidal Ideation
Protective Factors
Regression Analysis
Demography
Depression
Psychology

Cite this

@article{ee33c0963c8b4b029ac0b705c51b193e,
title = "Gender Differences in Risk and Protective factors for Resolved Plans and Preparations for Suicide among University Students",
abstract = "Background. Identifying the psychological predictors of suicide risk is essential because these variables may be amenable to change in treatment, unlike demographic or historical factors. Aims. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of past two-week suicidal ideation for males and females separately. Method. Participants were 1184 healthy adults who completed an online survey. Results. A significant association between suicidal ideation and gender was found, such that mean levels were significantly higher in females than males. Separate regression analyses accounted for significant amounts of variance in suicide ideation, 54{\%} for males and 68{\%} for females. Moreover, the analyses revealed that suicide resilience Factor 2 (Emotional Stability) was a protective factor for both males and females; however, defeat, goal disengagement, and depression were independently associated with suicide ideation in males but not females. By contrast, entrapment, perceived burdensomeness, and hopelessness Factor 3 (Future Expectations) were significant risk factors only in females. Conclusions. The findings have clinical and practical implications, which may guide future practice, and supports the notion of targeted prevention and intervention strategies.",
keywords = "Suicide ideation, Risk and protective factors, Gender differences, Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model (IMV)",
author = "Katie Dhingra and Agata Debowska and Daniel Boduszek and Parveen Ali",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Suicidology Online",
issn = "2078-5488",
number = "10",

}

Gender Differences in Risk and Protective factors for Resolved Plans and Preparations for Suicide among University Students. / Dhingra, Katie; Debowska, Agata; Boduszek, Daniel; Ali, Parveen.

In: Suicidology Online, Vol. 7, No. 10, 2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Differences in Risk and Protective factors for Resolved Plans and Preparations for Suicide among University Students

AU - Dhingra, Katie

AU - Debowska, Agata

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Ali, Parveen

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background. Identifying the psychological predictors of suicide risk is essential because these variables may be amenable to change in treatment, unlike demographic or historical factors. Aims. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of past two-week suicidal ideation for males and females separately. Method. Participants were 1184 healthy adults who completed an online survey. Results. A significant association between suicidal ideation and gender was found, such that mean levels were significantly higher in females than males. Separate regression analyses accounted for significant amounts of variance in suicide ideation, 54% for males and 68% for females. Moreover, the analyses revealed that suicide resilience Factor 2 (Emotional Stability) was a protective factor for both males and females; however, defeat, goal disengagement, and depression were independently associated with suicide ideation in males but not females. By contrast, entrapment, perceived burdensomeness, and hopelessness Factor 3 (Future Expectations) were significant risk factors only in females. Conclusions. The findings have clinical and practical implications, which may guide future practice, and supports the notion of targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

AB - Background. Identifying the psychological predictors of suicide risk is essential because these variables may be amenable to change in treatment, unlike demographic or historical factors. Aims. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of past two-week suicidal ideation for males and females separately. Method. Participants were 1184 healthy adults who completed an online survey. Results. A significant association between suicidal ideation and gender was found, such that mean levels were significantly higher in females than males. Separate regression analyses accounted for significant amounts of variance in suicide ideation, 54% for males and 68% for females. Moreover, the analyses revealed that suicide resilience Factor 2 (Emotional Stability) was a protective factor for both males and females; however, defeat, goal disengagement, and depression were independently associated with suicide ideation in males but not females. By contrast, entrapment, perceived burdensomeness, and hopelessness Factor 3 (Future Expectations) were significant risk factors only in females. Conclusions. The findings have clinical and practical implications, which may guide future practice, and supports the notion of targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

KW - Suicide ideation

KW - Risk and protective factors

KW - Gender differences

KW - Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model (IMV)

UR - http://www.suicidology-online.com/

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Suicidology Online

T2 - Suicidology Online

JF - Suicidology Online

SN - 2078-5488

IS - 10

ER -