Genomic evidence supports the "long chronology" for the peopling of Sahul

Francesca Gandini, Mafalda Almeida, M. George B. Foody, Nano Nagle, Anders Bergström, Anna Olivieri, Simão Rodrigues, Alessandro Fichera, Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia, Antonio Torroni, Alessandro Achilli, William Pomat, Zafarina Zainuddin, Ken Khong Eng, Tarek Shoeib, Teresa Rito, David Bulbeck, Sue O'Connor, Jarosław Bryk, Maria PalaMichael J. Grant, Ceiridwen J. Edwards, Stephen J. Oppenheimer, Robert J. Mitchell, Pedro A. Soares, Helen Farr, Martin B. Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The timing of the settlement of Sahul-the Pleistocene landmass formed by present-day New Guinea, Australia, and Tasmania that existed until ~9000 years ago (~9 ka)-remains highly contentious. The so-called "long chronology" posits the first main arrivals at ~60 to 65 ka, whereas a "short chronology" proposes 47 to 51 ka. Here, we exhaustively analyze an unprecedentedly large mitogenome dataset (n = 2456) encompassing the full range of diversity from the indigenous populations of Australia, New Guinea, and Oceania, including a lineage related to those of New Guinea in an archaeological sample from Wallacea. We assess these lineages in the context of variation from Southeast Asia and a reevaluation of the mitogenome mutation rate, alongside genome-wide and Y-chromosome variation, and archaeological and climatological evidence. In contrast to recent recombinational dating approaches, we find support for the long chronology, suggesting settlement by ~60 ka via at least two distinct routes into Sahul.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbeready9493
Number of pages17
JournalScience advances
Volume11
Issue number48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genomic evidence supports the "long chronology" for the peopling of Sahul'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this