Gift vs Bribe

What Counts as Corruption?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper builds theory concerned with the conceptual interpretation of the corruption threshold. In order to find the key to this issue, we ask, approximating corruption with a bribe, the following questions: (i) What is the threshold for corruption? and (ii) What is the difference between a bribe and a gift? Since this paper intends to conceptualise this phenomenon, which is seldom inquired about in qualitative, conceptual terms, we employ qualitative methodology to discuss our research questions in semi-structured interviews. Due to the necessity to access the information related to the threshold between gifts and bribes, we conduct a study with Czech managers due to the Czech managerial culture being one of gift-giving (Myant and Smith, 2006). We find, using Clarke and Braun’s (2006) protocol for thematic analysis of semi structured interview data, that the fundamental threshold for corruption is anything of a monetary nature; the threshold between bribery and a gift seems much less straight-forward with the intention, nature, timing, beneficiary and value being highlighted. Additionally, we find that whilst consensus is available for the former factors, the value of a ‘gift’ is highly subjective. Moreover, a great disparity is apparent between the public and private sectors. We consequently discuss these findings and their implications for practitioners and legislators.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 14th International Conference
Subtitle of host publicationLiberec Economic Forum 2019
EditorsKlára Antlová, Tereza Semerádová
Place of PublicationLiberec
PublisherTechnical University of Liberec
Pages154-162
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9788074944826
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2019
EventLiberec Economic Forum 2019 - Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
Duration: 17 Sep 201918 Sep 2019
https://issuu.com/ekonomicka_fakulta_tul/docs/lef_2019_proceedings_
http://lef.tul.cz/ (Link to conference website)

Conference

ConferenceLiberec Economic Forum 2019
Abbreviated titleLEF2019
CountryCzech Republic
CityLiberec
Period17/09/1918/09/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

Bribes
Gift
Corruption
Structured interview
Public and private sector
Thematic analysis
Bribery
Factors
Qualitative methodology
Gift giving
Managers
Nature

Cite this

Benesova, H., & Anchor, J. (2019). Gift vs Bribe: What Counts as Corruption? In K. Antlová, & T. Semerádová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference: Liberec Economic Forum 2019 (pp. 154-162). Liberec: Technical University of Liberec.
Benesova, Hana ; Anchor, John. / Gift vs Bribe : What Counts as Corruption?. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference: Liberec Economic Forum 2019. editor / Klára Antlová ; Tereza Semerádová. Liberec : Technical University of Liberec, 2019. pp. 154-162
@inproceedings{ab7da6a9dbb64fd5800b97834c06a49a,
title = "Gift vs Bribe: What Counts as Corruption?",
abstract = "This paper builds theory concerned with the conceptual interpretation of the corruption threshold. In order to find the key to this issue, we ask, approximating corruption with a bribe, the following questions: (i) What is the threshold for corruption? and (ii) What is the difference between a bribe and a gift? Since this paper intends to conceptualise this phenomenon, which is seldom inquired about in qualitative, conceptual terms, we employ qualitative methodology to discuss our research questions in semi-structured interviews. Due to the necessity to access the information related to the threshold between gifts and bribes, we conduct a study with Czech managers due to the Czech managerial culture being one of gift-giving (Myant and Smith, 2006). We find, using Clarke and Braun’s (2006) protocol for thematic analysis of semi structured interview data, that the fundamental threshold for corruption is anything of a monetary nature; the threshold between bribery and a gift seems much less straight-forward with the intention, nature, timing, beneficiary and value being highlighted. Additionally, we find that whilst consensus is available for the former factors, the value of a ‘gift’ is highly subjective. Moreover, a great disparity is apparent between the public and private sectors. We consequently discuss these findings and their implications for practitioners and legislators.",
keywords = "Corruption, Bribery, Gifts, Gift Culture, Business Ethics, Czech Republic",
author = "Hana Benesova and John Anchor",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788074944826",
pages = "154--162",
editor = "Kl{\'a}ra Antlov{\'a} and Tereza Semer{\'a}dov{\'a}",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 14th International Conference",
publisher = "Technical University of Liberec",
address = "Czech Republic",

}

Benesova, H & Anchor, J 2019, Gift vs Bribe: What Counts as Corruption? in K Antlová & T Semerádová (eds), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference: Liberec Economic Forum 2019. Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, pp. 154-162, Liberec Economic Forum 2019, Liberec, Czech Republic, 17/09/19.

Gift vs Bribe : What Counts as Corruption? / Benesova, Hana; Anchor, John.

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference: Liberec Economic Forum 2019. ed. / Klára Antlová; Tereza Semerádová. Liberec : Technical University of Liberec, 2019. p. 154-162.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Gift vs Bribe

T2 - What Counts as Corruption?

AU - Benesova, Hana

AU - Anchor, John

PY - 2019/9/2

Y1 - 2019/9/2

N2 - This paper builds theory concerned with the conceptual interpretation of the corruption threshold. In order to find the key to this issue, we ask, approximating corruption with a bribe, the following questions: (i) What is the threshold for corruption? and (ii) What is the difference between a bribe and a gift? Since this paper intends to conceptualise this phenomenon, which is seldom inquired about in qualitative, conceptual terms, we employ qualitative methodology to discuss our research questions in semi-structured interviews. Due to the necessity to access the information related to the threshold between gifts and bribes, we conduct a study with Czech managers due to the Czech managerial culture being one of gift-giving (Myant and Smith, 2006). We find, using Clarke and Braun’s (2006) protocol for thematic analysis of semi structured interview data, that the fundamental threshold for corruption is anything of a monetary nature; the threshold between bribery and a gift seems much less straight-forward with the intention, nature, timing, beneficiary and value being highlighted. Additionally, we find that whilst consensus is available for the former factors, the value of a ‘gift’ is highly subjective. Moreover, a great disparity is apparent between the public and private sectors. We consequently discuss these findings and their implications for practitioners and legislators.

AB - This paper builds theory concerned with the conceptual interpretation of the corruption threshold. In order to find the key to this issue, we ask, approximating corruption with a bribe, the following questions: (i) What is the threshold for corruption? and (ii) What is the difference between a bribe and a gift? Since this paper intends to conceptualise this phenomenon, which is seldom inquired about in qualitative, conceptual terms, we employ qualitative methodology to discuss our research questions in semi-structured interviews. Due to the necessity to access the information related to the threshold between gifts and bribes, we conduct a study with Czech managers due to the Czech managerial culture being one of gift-giving (Myant and Smith, 2006). We find, using Clarke and Braun’s (2006) protocol for thematic analysis of semi structured interview data, that the fundamental threshold for corruption is anything of a monetary nature; the threshold between bribery and a gift seems much less straight-forward with the intention, nature, timing, beneficiary and value being highlighted. Additionally, we find that whilst consensus is available for the former factors, the value of a ‘gift’ is highly subjective. Moreover, a great disparity is apparent between the public and private sectors. We consequently discuss these findings and their implications for practitioners and legislators.

KW - Corruption

KW - Bribery

KW - Gifts

KW - Gift Culture

KW - Business Ethics

KW - Czech Republic

UR - http://lef.tul.cz/proceedings.html

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9788074944826

SP - 154

EP - 162

BT - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference

A2 - Antlová, Klára

A2 - Semerádová, Tereza

PB - Technical University of Liberec

CY - Liberec

ER -

Benesova H, Anchor J. Gift vs Bribe: What Counts as Corruption? In Antlová K, Semerádová T, editors, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference: Liberec Economic Forum 2019. Liberec: Technical University of Liberec. 2019. p. 154-162