Abstract
A range of approaches have been used to develop and evaluate terminology mapping. In seeking to enhance existing methods this exploratory feasibility study examined a small subset of existing equivalency mappings between the International Classification for Nursing Practice and SNOMED CT. To identify potential inconsistencies in allocation, comparisons were made for each concept in each equivalency mapping, through a manual review of a) compositionality and specificity of asserted and inherited relationships, and b) ancestors through to root. There were similarities and several differences across the mappings which were both structural and definitional in nature. In order to demonstrate practical utility, the approach piloted in the present study might benefit from scaling up and a degree of automation. However, the study has demonstrated it is both feasible and potentially useful when evaluating terminology mapping to go beyond the surface language of mapped terms, and to consider the deeper definitional features of the underlying concepts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Innovation in Applied Nursing Informatics |
Editors | Gillian Strudwick, Nicholas R. Hardiker, Glynda Rees, Robyn Cook, Young Ji Lee |
Publisher | IOS Press BV |
Pages | 327-331 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Volume | 315 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781643685274 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24 Jul 2024 |
Event | 16th International Congress on Nursing Informatics - Manchester, United Kingdom Duration: 28 Jul 2024 → 31 Jul 2024 Conference number: 16 |
Publication series
Name | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS Press |
Volume | 315 |
ISSN (Print) | 0926-9630 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8365 |
Conference
Conference | 16th International Congress on Nursing Informatics |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | NI 2024 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Manchester |
Period | 28/07/24 → 31/07/24 |