Growth and Crisis in India’s Political Economy from 1991 to 2013

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 4.7% in the 1990 to 9% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to nearly half of that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of reform measures on the society, because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. However, this study finds that the mainstream economists ignore the role of domestic aggregate demand and inequality. India’s growth was led by the services sector, which included real estates, IT, telecommunications and banking, and contributed nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.
LanguageEnglish
Pages84-99
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Social and Economic Research
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date11 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Political economy
India
Telecommunications
Economists
Health
Education
Workforce
Service sector
Indian economy
Living conditions
Market reform
Economic growth
Asian economies
Aggregate demand
Productivity
Banking
Manufacturing
Income
Compromise
Real estate

Cite this

@article{6062b41d407b411d9ef8b89000ade758,
title = "Growth and Crisis in India’s Political Economy from 1991 to 2013",
abstract = "Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 4.7{\%} in the 1990 to 9{\%} in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to nearly half of that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of reform measures on the society, because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. However, this study finds that the mainstream economists ignore the role of domestic aggregate demand and inequality. India’s growth was led by the services sector, which included real estates, IT, telecommunications and banking, and contributed nearly 50{\%} to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.",
keywords = "Indian economy, Neoliberal economic reforms, Growth, Poverty, Inequality",
author = "Kalim Siddiqui",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5958/2249-6270.2014.00487.5",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "84--99",
journal = "International Journal of Social and Economic Research",
issn = "2249-6270",
number = "2",

}

Growth and Crisis in India’s Political Economy from 1991 to 2013. / Siddiqui, Kalim.

In: International Journal of Social and Economic Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2014, p. 84-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Growth and Crisis in India’s Political Economy from 1991 to 2013

AU - Siddiqui, Kalim

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 4.7% in the 1990 to 9% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to nearly half of that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of reform measures on the society, because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. However, this study finds that the mainstream economists ignore the role of domestic aggregate demand and inequality. India’s growth was led by the services sector, which included real estates, IT, telecommunications and banking, and contributed nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.

AB - Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 4.7% in the 1990 to 9% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to nearly half of that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of reform measures on the society, because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. However, this study finds that the mainstream economists ignore the role of domestic aggregate demand and inequality. India’s growth was led by the services sector, which included real estates, IT, telecommunications and banking, and contributed nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.

KW - Indian economy

KW - Neoliberal economic reforms

KW - Growth

KW - Poverty

KW - Inequality

UR - http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijser&volume=4&issue=2&type=toc

U2 - 10.5958/2249-6270.2014.00487.5

DO - 10.5958/2249-6270.2014.00487.5

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 84

EP - 99

JO - International Journal of Social and Economic Research

T2 - International Journal of Social and Economic Research

JF - International Journal of Social and Economic Research

SN - 2249-6270

IS - 2

ER -