Halal meat and religious slaughter: From spatial concealment to social controversy – Breaching the boundaries of the permissible?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Across the secular West, the slaughter of animals for food has become an almost clandestine activity. Very occasionally however, when slaughter comes into view, social and political controversy emerges. In this paper, I examine two such episodes in England and the controversies subsequently engendered: the controversy over kosher meat and the Jewish method of slaughter (shechita) in the 19th century, and the contemporary controversy over halal meat and the Muslim method of slaughter (dhabiha). These controversies are complex and double-edged in that, not only do they involve food, which often invokes anxieties about what is being ingested and what moral boundaries are being crossed, they also involve religion. Both episodes are also linked to periods of rapid migration into the UK, and to concerns about integration and the threats posed to British values and national identity by the food practices of outsiders. However, while concern over kosher meat production and Jewish migrants in the 19th century was largely concealed within the spatial boundaries of Jewish communities, from the late 20th century onwards halal meat has become increasingly visible in line with the demographic expansion of the Muslim population out of racialized community spaces. It is in this context, I contend, in line with a new and emerging geography of religious food practice, that halal meat has breached the boundaries of the permissible to challenge the ‘civilized’ values underpinning the hegemonic food discourse.
LanguageEnglish
Pages889-907
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Politics and Space
Volume37
Issue number5
Early online date28 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

meat
food
Muslim
national identity
religion
community
Values
migrant
animal
Religion
migration
threat
geography
anxiety
discourse
method

Cite this

@article{ba806efc46494f7182a227b03dfb82b6,
title = "Halal meat and religious slaughter: From spatial concealment to social controversy – Breaching the boundaries of the permissible?",
abstract = "Across the secular West, the slaughter of animals for food has become an almost clandestine activity. Very occasionally however, when slaughter comes into view, social and political controversy emerges. In this paper, I examine two such episodes in England and the controversies subsequently engendered: the controversy over kosher meat and the Jewish method of slaughter (shechita) in the 19th century, and the contemporary controversy over halal meat and the Muslim method of slaughter (dhabiha). These controversies are complex and double-edged in that, not only do they involve food, which often invokes anxieties about what is being ingested and what moral boundaries are being crossed, they also involve religion. Both episodes are also linked to periods of rapid migration into the UK, and to concerns about integration and the threats posed to British values and national identity by the food practices of outsiders. However, while concern over kosher meat production and Jewish migrants in the 19th century was largely concealed within the spatial boundaries of Jewish communities, from the late 20th century onwards halal meat has become increasingly visible in line with the demographic expansion of the Muslim population out of racialized community spaces. It is in this context, I contend, in line with a new and emerging geography of religious food practice, that halal meat has breached the boundaries of the permissible to challenge the ‘civilized’ values underpinning the hegemonic food discourse.",
keywords = "Animal slaughter, Animal welfare, Civilizing process, Halal and kosher meat, Hegemonic food discourse, Migration, Outsiders, Stunning",
author = "John Lever",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2399654418813267",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "889--907",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Halal meat and religious slaughter

T2 - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

AU - Lever, John

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Across the secular West, the slaughter of animals for food has become an almost clandestine activity. Very occasionally however, when slaughter comes into view, social and political controversy emerges. In this paper, I examine two such episodes in England and the controversies subsequently engendered: the controversy over kosher meat and the Jewish method of slaughter (shechita) in the 19th century, and the contemporary controversy over halal meat and the Muslim method of slaughter (dhabiha). These controversies are complex and double-edged in that, not only do they involve food, which often invokes anxieties about what is being ingested and what moral boundaries are being crossed, they also involve religion. Both episodes are also linked to periods of rapid migration into the UK, and to concerns about integration and the threats posed to British values and national identity by the food practices of outsiders. However, while concern over kosher meat production and Jewish migrants in the 19th century was largely concealed within the spatial boundaries of Jewish communities, from the late 20th century onwards halal meat has become increasingly visible in line with the demographic expansion of the Muslim population out of racialized community spaces. It is in this context, I contend, in line with a new and emerging geography of religious food practice, that halal meat has breached the boundaries of the permissible to challenge the ‘civilized’ values underpinning the hegemonic food discourse.

AB - Across the secular West, the slaughter of animals for food has become an almost clandestine activity. Very occasionally however, when slaughter comes into view, social and political controversy emerges. In this paper, I examine two such episodes in England and the controversies subsequently engendered: the controversy over kosher meat and the Jewish method of slaughter (shechita) in the 19th century, and the contemporary controversy over halal meat and the Muslim method of slaughter (dhabiha). These controversies are complex and double-edged in that, not only do they involve food, which often invokes anxieties about what is being ingested and what moral boundaries are being crossed, they also involve religion. Both episodes are also linked to periods of rapid migration into the UK, and to concerns about integration and the threats posed to British values and national identity by the food practices of outsiders. However, while concern over kosher meat production and Jewish migrants in the 19th century was largely concealed within the spatial boundaries of Jewish communities, from the late 20th century onwards halal meat has become increasingly visible in line with the demographic expansion of the Muslim population out of racialized community spaces. It is in this context, I contend, in line with a new and emerging geography of religious food practice, that halal meat has breached the boundaries of the permissible to challenge the ‘civilized’ values underpinning the hegemonic food discourse.

KW - Animal slaughter

KW - Animal welfare

KW - Civilizing process

KW - Halal and kosher meat

KW - Hegemonic food discourse

KW - Migration

KW - Outsiders

KW - Stunning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059104624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2399654418813267

DO - 10.1177/2399654418813267

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 889

EP - 907

JO - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

JF - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 5

ER -