Healthcare and health Innovation in Europe: Regulating for public benefit or for commercial profit?

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Regulatory justifications raise important issues about the degree to which health care provision can secure public benefits and respect individual rights, while actively seeking market benefits such as cost-efficiencies and private profits. Yet, the dialectic between the interests of users of health care products and services, and the interests of health care providers and producers is inherently lost by contributions to the literature adopting divergent analytical perspectives. This journal exemplifies the diversity of existing literature through five papers which all speak to entirely different analytical regulatory perspectives and relate to fundamentally different contexts of health care, but each adds to a collective understanding of the dynamic between public and private interests.
LanguageEnglish
Article numberEditorial
Pages403-409
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume12
Issue numberSpecial Issue: 4
Early online date17 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Health
Health Personnel
Health Services
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{b0748f9b991042e18c215abc1bd3b6e4,
title = "Healthcare and health Innovation in Europe: Regulating for public benefit or for commercial profit?",
abstract = "Regulatory justifications raise important issues about the degree to which health care provision can secure public benefits and respect individual rights, while actively seeking market benefits such as cost-efficiencies and private profits. Yet, the dialectic between the interests of users of health care products and services, and the interests of health care providers and producers is inherently lost by contributions to the literature adopting divergent analytical perspectives. This journal exemplifies the diversity of existing literature through five papers which all speak to entirely different analytical regulatory perspectives and relate to fundamentally different contexts of health care, but each adds to a collective understanding of the dynamic between public and private interests.",
keywords = "Public Interest, Private Interests, Regulatory Theory, Justifications, Healthcare Regulation, Innovation",
author = "Amanda Warren-Jones",
note = "Papers coming out of the 2015 Symposium funded by the Sheffield Health Law and Policy Research Centre, Sheffield University School of Law, which included international speakers and attendees.",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/S1744133117000081",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "403--409",
journal = "Health Economics, Policy and Law",
issn = "1744-1331",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "Special Issue: 4",

}

Healthcare and health Innovation in Europe : Regulating for public benefit or for commercial profit? / Warren-Jones, Amanda.

In: Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 12, No. Special Issue: 4, Editorial, 10.2017, p. 403-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare and health Innovation in Europe

T2 - Health Economics, Policy and Law

AU - Warren-Jones, Amanda

N1 - Papers coming out of the 2015 Symposium funded by the Sheffield Health Law and Policy Research Centre, Sheffield University School of Law, which included international speakers and attendees.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Regulatory justifications raise important issues about the degree to which health care provision can secure public benefits and respect individual rights, while actively seeking market benefits such as cost-efficiencies and private profits. Yet, the dialectic between the interests of users of health care products and services, and the interests of health care providers and producers is inherently lost by contributions to the literature adopting divergent analytical perspectives. This journal exemplifies the diversity of existing literature through five papers which all speak to entirely different analytical regulatory perspectives and relate to fundamentally different contexts of health care, but each adds to a collective understanding of the dynamic between public and private interests.

AB - Regulatory justifications raise important issues about the degree to which health care provision can secure public benefits and respect individual rights, while actively seeking market benefits such as cost-efficiencies and private profits. Yet, the dialectic between the interests of users of health care products and services, and the interests of health care providers and producers is inherently lost by contributions to the literature adopting divergent analytical perspectives. This journal exemplifies the diversity of existing literature through five papers which all speak to entirely different analytical regulatory perspectives and relate to fundamentally different contexts of health care, but each adds to a collective understanding of the dynamic between public and private interests.

KW - Public Interest

KW - Private Interests

KW - Regulatory Theory

KW - Justifications

KW - Healthcare Regulation

KW - Innovation

U2 - 10.1017/S1744133117000081

DO - 10.1017/S1744133117000081

M3 - Editorial

VL - 12

SP - 403

EP - 409

JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law

JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law

SN - 1744-1331

IS - Special Issue: 4

M1 - Editorial

ER -