TY - JOUR
T1 - High-Performance Control of Dual-Inertia Servo-Drive Systems Using Low-Cost Integrated SAW Torque Transducers
AU - O'Sullivan, Tim M.
AU - Bingham, Chris M.
AU - Schofield, Nigel
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received August 17, 2004; revised October 20, 2004. Abstract published on the Internet May 18, 2006. This work was supported in part by the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and in part by Sensor Technology, Ltd., Banbury, U.K.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the U.K. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) and Sensor Technology, Ltd., Banbury, U.K., for the provision of an EPSRC CASE studentship.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/6/1
Y1 - 2006/6/1
N2 - This paper provides a systematic comparative study of compensation schemes for the coordinated motion control of two-inertia mechanical systems. Specifically, classical proportional-integral (PI), proportional-integral-derivative (PID), and resonance ratio control (RRC) are considered, with an enhanced structure based on RRC, termed RRC+, being proposed. Motor-side and load-side dynamics for each control structure are identified, with the "integral of time multiplied by absolute error" performance index being employed as a benchmark metric. PID and RRC control schemes are shown to be identical from a closed-loop perspective, albeit employing different feedback sensing mechanisms. A qualitative study of the practical effects of employing each methodology shows that RRC-type structures provide preferred solutions if low-cost high-performance torque transducers can be employed, for instance, those based on surface acoustic wave technologies. Moreover, the extra degree of freedom afforded by both PID and RRC, as compared with the basic PI, is shown to be sufficient to simultaneously induce optimal closed-loop performance and independent selection of virtual inertia ratio. Furthermore, the proposed RRC+ scheme is subsequently shown to additionally facilitate independent assignment of closed-loop bandwidth. Summary attributes of the investigation are validated by both simulation studies and by realization of the methodologies for control of a custom-designed two-inertia system.
AB - This paper provides a systematic comparative study of compensation schemes for the coordinated motion control of two-inertia mechanical systems. Specifically, classical proportional-integral (PI), proportional-integral-derivative (PID), and resonance ratio control (RRC) are considered, with an enhanced structure based on RRC, termed RRC+, being proposed. Motor-side and load-side dynamics for each control structure are identified, with the "integral of time multiplied by absolute error" performance index being employed as a benchmark metric. PID and RRC control schemes are shown to be identical from a closed-loop perspective, albeit employing different feedback sensing mechanisms. A qualitative study of the practical effects of employing each methodology shows that RRC-type structures provide preferred solutions if low-cost high-performance torque transducers can be employed, for instance, those based on surface acoustic wave technologies. Moreover, the extra degree of freedom afforded by both PID and RRC, as compared with the basic PI, is shown to be sufficient to simultaneously induce optimal closed-loop performance and independent selection of virtual inertia ratio. Furthermore, the proposed RRC+ scheme is subsequently shown to additionally facilitate independent assignment of closed-loop bandwidth. Summary attributes of the investigation are validated by both simulation studies and by realization of the methodologies for control of a custom-designed two-inertia system.
KW - Acceleration control
KW - Motion control
KW - Resonance
KW - Surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices
KW - Torque control
KW - Velocity control
KW - Vibration control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747584890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TIE.2006.878311
DO - 10.1109/TIE.2006.878311
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33747584890
VL - 53
SP - 1226
EP - 1237
JO - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
SN - 0278-0046
IS - 4
M1 - 1667920
ER -