TY - JOUR
T1 - Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness
AU - Pan, Yuling
AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.
AB - The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.
KW - Chinese
KW - Contemporary
KW - Historical
KW - Politeness
KW - Postcolonial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952005715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79952005715
VL - 43
SP - 1525
EP - 1539
JO - Journal of Pragmatics
JF - Journal of Pragmatics
SN - 0378-2166
IS - 6
ER -