Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness

Yuling Pan, Dániel Z. Kádár

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1525-1539
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume43
Issue number6
Early online date15 Dec 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

politeness
Linguistics
linguistics
Communication
colonization
Ideologies
China
Politeness
Chinese Linguistics
Linguistic Politeness
invasion
pragmatics
communication
language

Cite this

Pan, Yuling ; Kádár, Dániel Z. / Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness. In: Journal of Pragmatics. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 6. pp. 1525-1539.
@article{2d4bba54633740f9a161e3928dd3aefa,
title = "Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness",
abstract = "The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.",
keywords = "Chinese, Contemporary, Historical, Politeness, Postcolonial",
author = "Yuling Pan and K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1525--1539",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness. / Pan, Yuling; Kádár, Dániel Z.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 43, No. 6, 05.2011, p. 1525-1539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness

AU - Pan, Yuling

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.

AB - The present paper provides a comparative survey of historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, hence contributing to postcolonial pragmatics and linguistic politeness research. There is a unique gulf between historical and contemporary Chinese politeness, which is largely due to the influence of the 19th century colonization of China. While China was in fact partially colonized only, the invasion by foreign imperialist powers had a strong impact on the development of Chinese sociopragmatic norms. By demonstrating the gulf between 'historical' and 'contemporary', this paper provides an unprecedented case study for the influence of colonization on native language use. The analysis is divided into two parts. The first part, section of the paper, analyzes the ideologies, norms and practices of historical Chinese politeness, and demonstrates that historical Chinese politeness had some features that made it vulnerable to large scale socio-historical changes that led to the birth of contemporary Chinese politeness. Section, after reviewing politeness norms and ideologies in contemporary China, examine the similarities and differences between historical and contemporary practices of polite communication.

KW - Chinese

KW - Contemporary

KW - Historical

KW - Politeness

KW - Postcolonial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952005715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1525

EP - 1539

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

IS - 6

ER -