History and GIS

Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections

Alexander Von Lünen (Editor), Charles Travis (Editor)

Research output: Book/ReportBook

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) " either as "standard" GIS or custom made Historical GIS (HGIS) " have become quite popular in some historical sub-disciplines, such as Economic and Social History or Historical Geography. "Mainstream" history, however, seems to be rather unaffected by this trend. More generally speaking: Why is it that computer applications in general have failed to make much headway in history departments, despite the first steps being undertaken a good forty years ago? With the "spatial turn" in full swing in the humanities, and many historians dealing with spatial and geographical questions, one would think GIS would be welcomed with open arms. Yet there seems to be no general anticipation by historians of employing GIS as a research tool. As mentioned, HGIS are popular chiefly among Historical Geographers and Social and Economic Historians. The latter disciplines seem to be predestined to use such software through the widespread quantitative methodology these disciplines have employed traditionally. Other historical sub-disciplines, such as Ancient History, are also very open to this emerging technology since the scarcity of written sources in this field can be mitigated by inferences made from an HGIS that has archaeological data stored in it, for example. In most of Modern History, however, the use of GIS is rarely seen. The intellectual benefit that a GIS may bring about seems not be apparent to scholars from this sub-discipline (and others). This book wants to investigate and discuss this controversy. Why does the wider historian community not embrace GIS more readily? While one cannot deny that the methodologies linked with a GIS follow geographical paradigms rather than historical ones, the potential of GIS as a 'killer application' for digital historical scholarship should be obvious. This book brings together authors from Geography and History to discuss the value of GIS for historical research. The focus, however, will not be on the "how", but on the "why" of GIS in history.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Number of pages242
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9789400750098
ISBN (Print)9400750080, 9789400750081
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information systems
History
GIS
history
Geographic information systems
Economics
Computer applications
social history
economic history
historical geography
methodology
software

Cite this

Von Lünen, Alexander (Editor) ; Travis, Charles (Editor). / History and GIS : Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections. 1 ed. Springer Netherlands, 2012. 242 p.
@book{ecc3da3c45be4812852b8873b10db522,
title = "History and GIS: Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections",
abstract = "Geographical Information Systems (GIS) {"} either as {"}standard{"} GIS or custom made Historical GIS (HGIS) {"} have become quite popular in some historical sub-disciplines, such as Economic and Social History or Historical Geography. {"}Mainstream{"} history, however, seems to be rather unaffected by this trend. More generally speaking: Why is it that computer applications in general have failed to make much headway in history departments, despite the first steps being undertaken a good forty years ago? With the {"}spatial turn{"} in full swing in the humanities, and many historians dealing with spatial and geographical questions, one would think GIS would be welcomed with open arms. Yet there seems to be no general anticipation by historians of employing GIS as a research tool. As mentioned, HGIS are popular chiefly among Historical Geographers and Social and Economic Historians. The latter disciplines seem to be predestined to use such software through the widespread quantitative methodology these disciplines have employed traditionally. Other historical sub-disciplines, such as Ancient History, are also very open to this emerging technology since the scarcity of written sources in this field can be mitigated by inferences made from an HGIS that has archaeological data stored in it, for example. In most of Modern History, however, the use of GIS is rarely seen. The intellectual benefit that a GIS may bring about seems not be apparent to scholars from this sub-discipline (and others). This book wants to investigate and discuss this controversy. Why does the wider historian community not embrace GIS more readily? While one cannot deny that the methodologies linked with a GIS follow geographical paradigms rather than historical ones, the potential of GIS as a 'killer application' for digital historical scholarship should be obvious. This book brings together authors from Geography and History to discuss the value of GIS for historical research. The focus, however, will not be on the {"}how{"}, but on the {"}why{"} of GIS in history.",
keywords = "GIS, Historical geography, History, philosophy, spatial turn",
editor = "{Von L{\"u}nen}, Alexander and Charles Travis",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9400750080",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
edition = "1",

}

History and GIS : Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections. / Von Lünen, Alexander (Editor); Travis, Charles (Editor).

1 ed. Springer Netherlands, 2012. 242 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

TY - BOOK

T1 - History and GIS

T2 - Epistemologies, Considerations and Reflections

A2 - Von Lünen, Alexander

A2 - Travis, Charles

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Geographical Information Systems (GIS) " either as "standard" GIS or custom made Historical GIS (HGIS) " have become quite popular in some historical sub-disciplines, such as Economic and Social History or Historical Geography. "Mainstream" history, however, seems to be rather unaffected by this trend. More generally speaking: Why is it that computer applications in general have failed to make much headway in history departments, despite the first steps being undertaken a good forty years ago? With the "spatial turn" in full swing in the humanities, and many historians dealing with spatial and geographical questions, one would think GIS would be welcomed with open arms. Yet there seems to be no general anticipation by historians of employing GIS as a research tool. As mentioned, HGIS are popular chiefly among Historical Geographers and Social and Economic Historians. The latter disciplines seem to be predestined to use such software through the widespread quantitative methodology these disciplines have employed traditionally. Other historical sub-disciplines, such as Ancient History, are also very open to this emerging technology since the scarcity of written sources in this field can be mitigated by inferences made from an HGIS that has archaeological data stored in it, for example. In most of Modern History, however, the use of GIS is rarely seen. The intellectual benefit that a GIS may bring about seems not be apparent to scholars from this sub-discipline (and others). This book wants to investigate and discuss this controversy. Why does the wider historian community not embrace GIS more readily? While one cannot deny that the methodologies linked with a GIS follow geographical paradigms rather than historical ones, the potential of GIS as a 'killer application' for digital historical scholarship should be obvious. This book brings together authors from Geography and History to discuss the value of GIS for historical research. The focus, however, will not be on the "how", but on the "why" of GIS in history.

AB - Geographical Information Systems (GIS) " either as "standard" GIS or custom made Historical GIS (HGIS) " have become quite popular in some historical sub-disciplines, such as Economic and Social History or Historical Geography. "Mainstream" history, however, seems to be rather unaffected by this trend. More generally speaking: Why is it that computer applications in general have failed to make much headway in history departments, despite the first steps being undertaken a good forty years ago? With the "spatial turn" in full swing in the humanities, and many historians dealing with spatial and geographical questions, one would think GIS would be welcomed with open arms. Yet there seems to be no general anticipation by historians of employing GIS as a research tool. As mentioned, HGIS are popular chiefly among Historical Geographers and Social and Economic Historians. The latter disciplines seem to be predestined to use such software through the widespread quantitative methodology these disciplines have employed traditionally. Other historical sub-disciplines, such as Ancient History, are also very open to this emerging technology since the scarcity of written sources in this field can be mitigated by inferences made from an HGIS that has archaeological data stored in it, for example. In most of Modern History, however, the use of GIS is rarely seen. The intellectual benefit that a GIS may bring about seems not be apparent to scholars from this sub-discipline (and others). This book wants to investigate and discuss this controversy. Why does the wider historian community not embrace GIS more readily? While one cannot deny that the methodologies linked with a GIS follow geographical paradigms rather than historical ones, the potential of GIS as a 'killer application' for digital historical scholarship should be obvious. This book brings together authors from Geography and History to discuss the value of GIS for historical research. The focus, however, will not be on the "how", but on the "why" of GIS in history.

KW - GIS

KW - Historical geography

KW - History

KW - philosophy

KW - spatial turn

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932134947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8

M3 - Book

SN - 9400750080

SN - 9789400750081

BT - History and GIS

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -