Hospital postnatal discharge and sepsis advice: Perspectives of women and midwifery students

Melanie Haith-Cooper, Tomasina Stacey, Fran Bailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Women are discharged home from hospital increasingly early, but there is little evidence examining the postnatal hospital discharge process and how this may impact on the health of women and babies. In particular, there is little on sepsis prevention advice, despite it being the biggest direct cause of maternal mortality.
Aim:To explore the perceptions of women and senior student midwives related to the postnatal hospital discharge process and maternal sepsis prevention advice.
Methods: Three focus group interviews were undertaken, involving 9 senior student midwives and 14 women attending paid or specialist classes for vulnerable migrant women.
Findings: All participants believed that the postnatal hospital discharge process was inadequate, rushed and inconsistent. Sepsis advice was patchy and the condition underplayed.
Conclusions: Cost effective, time-efficient and innovative ways to impart vital information are required to support the postnatal hospital discharge process.
LanguageEnglish
Pages248-253
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Midwifery
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Sepsis
Students
Maternal Mortality
Women's Health
Focus Groups
Mothers
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{52cc606edb834209a8842beb73a455a9,
title = "Hospital postnatal discharge and sepsis advice: Perspectives of women and midwifery students",
abstract = "Background: Women are discharged home from hospital increasingly early, but there is little evidence examining the postnatal hospital discharge process and how this may impact on the health of women and babies. In particular, there is little on sepsis prevention advice, despite it being the biggest direct cause of maternal mortality.Aim:To explore the perceptions of women and senior student midwives related to the postnatal hospital discharge process and maternal sepsis prevention advice.Methods: Three focus group interviews were undertaken, involving 9 senior student midwives and 14 women attending paid or specialist classes for vulnerable migrant women.Findings: All participants believed that the postnatal hospital discharge process was inadequate, rushed and inconsistent. Sepsis advice was patchy and the condition underplayed.Conclusions: Cost effective, time-efficient and innovative ways to impart vital information are required to support the postnatal hospital discharge process.",
keywords = "Postnatal hospital discharge, Maternal sepsis, Focus group discussion",
author = "Melanie Haith-Cooper and Tomasina Stacey and Fran Bailey",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.12968/bjom.2018.26.4.248",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "248--253",
journal = "British Journal of Midwifery",
issn = "0969-4900",
publisher = "MA Healthcare London",
number = "4",

}

Hospital postnatal discharge and sepsis advice : Perspectives of women and midwifery students. / Haith-Cooper, Melanie; Stacey, Tomasina; Bailey, Fran.

In: British Journal of Midwifery, Vol. 26, No. 4, 02.04.2018, p. 248-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital postnatal discharge and sepsis advice

T2 - British Journal of Midwifery

AU - Haith-Cooper, Melanie

AU - Stacey, Tomasina

AU - Bailey, Fran

PY - 2018/4/2

Y1 - 2018/4/2

N2 - Background: Women are discharged home from hospital increasingly early, but there is little evidence examining the postnatal hospital discharge process and how this may impact on the health of women and babies. In particular, there is little on sepsis prevention advice, despite it being the biggest direct cause of maternal mortality.Aim:To explore the perceptions of women and senior student midwives related to the postnatal hospital discharge process and maternal sepsis prevention advice.Methods: Three focus group interviews were undertaken, involving 9 senior student midwives and 14 women attending paid or specialist classes for vulnerable migrant women.Findings: All participants believed that the postnatal hospital discharge process was inadequate, rushed and inconsistent. Sepsis advice was patchy and the condition underplayed.Conclusions: Cost effective, time-efficient and innovative ways to impart vital information are required to support the postnatal hospital discharge process.

AB - Background: Women are discharged home from hospital increasingly early, but there is little evidence examining the postnatal hospital discharge process and how this may impact on the health of women and babies. In particular, there is little on sepsis prevention advice, despite it being the biggest direct cause of maternal mortality.Aim:To explore the perceptions of women and senior student midwives related to the postnatal hospital discharge process and maternal sepsis prevention advice.Methods: Three focus group interviews were undertaken, involving 9 senior student midwives and 14 women attending paid or specialist classes for vulnerable migrant women.Findings: All participants believed that the postnatal hospital discharge process was inadequate, rushed and inconsistent. Sepsis advice was patchy and the condition underplayed.Conclusions: Cost effective, time-efficient and innovative ways to impart vital information are required to support the postnatal hospital discharge process.

KW - Postnatal hospital discharge

KW - Maternal sepsis

KW - Focus group discussion

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044853685&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Hospital+postnatal+discharge+and+sepsis+advice%3a+Perspectives+of+women+and+midwifery+students&st2=&sid=55ab037e93c7586993f9dbd44ac3c671&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=107&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Hospital+postnatal+discharge+and+sepsis+advice%3a+Perspectives+of+women+and+midwifery+students%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

U2 - 10.12968/bjom.2018.26.4.248

DO - 10.12968/bjom.2018.26.4.248

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 248

EP - 253

JO - British Journal of Midwifery

JF - British Journal of Midwifery

SN - 0969-4900

IS - 4

ER -