TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘How Did This Happen?’
T2 - Making Retrospective, Present and Prospective Sense of Intimate Relationships Where Men Have Been Violent
AU - Ólafsdóttir, Katrín
AU - Hearn, Jeff
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to extend our thanks to the reviewers of the article for taking the time to review our submission and for your kind words and constructive comments. We would also like to thank the editor, Sally R. Munt, for support in this process. This work was supported by the Icelandic Centre for Research and the University of Iceland (grant: Gender Equality Fund and Eimskip Fund).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - In seeking to explain intimate partner violence (IPV), feminist research has shifted its focus from individual explanations to the social contexts of such violence. Adopting such a perspective, we explore the narratives of three men who identify as perpetrators of violence and three women who identify as victims/survivors of IPV. Our analyses focus on how the participants present their relationships, employing the notion of affective – discursive practices as informing, at times constituting, the participants’ experiences. Their stories are characterised by a chronological line – retrospective, present and prospective. Their understandings change in framing their experiences, with the relationships themselves becoming affective–discursive practices, albeit figuring differently in the participants’ stories across time. Our findings also underline the significance of shame as a regulatory mechanism sustaining heteronormative practices.
AB - In seeking to explain intimate partner violence (IPV), feminist research has shifted its focus from individual explanations to the social contexts of such violence. Adopting such a perspective, we explore the narratives of three men who identify as perpetrators of violence and three women who identify as victims/survivors of IPV. Our analyses focus on how the participants present their relationships, employing the notion of affective – discursive practices as informing, at times constituting, the participants’ experiences. Their stories are characterised by a chronological line – retrospective, present and prospective. Their understandings change in framing their experiences, with the relationships themselves becoming affective–discursive practices, albeit figuring differently in the participants’ stories across time. Our findings also underline the significance of shame as a regulatory mechanism sustaining heteronormative practices.
KW - affective–discursive practices
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - shame
KW - temporal perspective
KW - violence against women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149622808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20897/femenc/12891
DO - 10.20897/femenc/12891
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149622808
VL - 7
JO - Feminist Encounters
JF - Feminist Encounters
SN - 2468-4414
IS - 1
M1 - 13
ER -