How freshwater biomonitoring tools vary sub-seasonally reflects temporary river flow regimes

James White, Patrick Armitage, Jon Bass, Richard Chadd, Matthew Hill, Kate Mathers, Sally Little, Paul Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Characterizing temporary river ecosystem responses to flow regimes is vital for conserving their biodiversity and the services they provide to society. However, freshwater biomonitoring tools rarely reflect community responses to hydrological variations or flow cessation events, and those available have not been widely tested within temporary rivers. This study examines two invertebrate biomonitoring tools characterizing community responses to different flow-related properties: the “Drought Effect of Habitat Loss on Invertebrates” (DEHLI) and “Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation” (LIFE), which, respectively reflect community responses to habitat and hydraulic properties associated with changing flow conditions. Sub-seasonal (monthly) variations of LIFE and DEHLI were explored within two groundwater-fed intermittent rivers, one dries sporadically (a flashy, karstic hydrology—River Lathkill) and the other dries seasonally (a highly buffered flow regime—South Winterbourne). Biomonitoring tools were highly sensitive to channel drying and also responded to reduced discharges in permanently flowing reaches. Biomonitoring tools captured ecological recovery patterns in the Lathkill following a supra-seasonal drought. Some unexpected results were observed in the South Winterbourne where LIFE and DEHLI indicated relatively high-flow conditions despite low discharges occurring during some summer months. This probably reflected macrophyte encroachment, which benefitted certain invertebrates (e.g., marginal-dwelling taxa) and highlights the importance of considering instream habitat conditions when interpreting flow regime influences on biomonitoring tools. Although LIFE and DEHLI were positively correlated, the latter responded more clearly to drying events, highlighting that communities respond strongly to the disconnection of instream habitats as flows recede. The results highlighted short-term ecological responses to hydrological variations and the value in adopting sub-seasonal sampling strategies within temporary rivers. Findings from this study indicate the importance of establishing flow response guilds which group taxa that respond comparably to flow cessation events. Such information could be adopted within biomonitoring practices to better characterize temporary river ecosystem responses to hydrological variations.

LanguageEnglish
JournalRiver Research and Applications
Early online date8 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

biomonitoring
river flow
Rivers
Drought
invertebrate
habitat loss
drought
community response
river
Ecosystems
ecosystem response
Drying
Invertebrates
habitat
Hydrology
Biodiversity
Groundwater
hydraulic property
Hydraulics
guild

Cite this

White, James ; Armitage, Patrick ; Bass, Jon ; Chadd, Richard ; Hill, Matthew ; Mathers, Kate ; Little, Sally ; Wood, Paul. / How freshwater biomonitoring tools vary sub-seasonally reflects temporary river flow regimes. In: River Research and Applications. 2019.
@article{0e32430d2fed4af98037bd3228c988f4,
title = "How freshwater biomonitoring tools vary sub-seasonally reflects temporary river flow regimes",
abstract = "Characterizing temporary river ecosystem responses to flow regimes is vital for conserving their biodiversity and the services they provide to society. However, freshwater biomonitoring tools rarely reflect community responses to hydrological variations or flow cessation events, and those available have not been widely tested within temporary rivers. This study examines two invertebrate biomonitoring tools characterizing community responses to different flow-related properties: the “Drought Effect of Habitat Loss on Invertebrates” (DEHLI) and “Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation” (LIFE), which, respectively reflect community responses to habitat and hydraulic properties associated with changing flow conditions. Sub-seasonal (monthly) variations of LIFE and DEHLI were explored within two groundwater-fed intermittent rivers, one dries sporadically (a flashy, karstic hydrology—River Lathkill) and the other dries seasonally (a highly buffered flow regime—South Winterbourne). Biomonitoring tools were highly sensitive to channel drying and also responded to reduced discharges in permanently flowing reaches. Biomonitoring tools captured ecological recovery patterns in the Lathkill following a supra-seasonal drought. Some unexpected results were observed in the South Winterbourne where LIFE and DEHLI indicated relatively high-flow conditions despite low discharges occurring during some summer months. This probably reflected macrophyte encroachment, which benefitted certain invertebrates (e.g., marginal-dwelling taxa) and highlights the importance of considering instream habitat conditions when interpreting flow regime influences on biomonitoring tools. Although LIFE and DEHLI were positively correlated, the latter responded more clearly to drying events, highlighting that communities respond strongly to the disconnection of instream habitats as flows recede. The results highlighted short-term ecological responses to hydrological variations and the value in adopting sub-seasonal sampling strategies within temporary rivers. Findings from this study indicate the importance of establishing flow response guilds which group taxa that respond comparably to flow cessation events. Such information could be adopted within biomonitoring practices to better characterize temporary river ecosystem responses to hydrological variations.",
keywords = "Intermittent, Ecology, Flow cessation, Biomonitoring, Intra-annual, ecology, biomonitoring, intermittent, intra-annual, flow cessation",
author = "James White and Patrick Armitage and Jon Bass and Richard Chadd and Matthew Hill and Kate Mathers and Sally Little and Paul Wood",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1002/rra.3501",
language = "English",
journal = "River Research and Applications",
issn = "1535-1459",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

How freshwater biomonitoring tools vary sub-seasonally reflects temporary river flow regimes. / White, James ; Armitage, Patrick ; Bass, Jon; Chadd, Richard ; Hill, Matthew; Mathers, Kate ; Little, Sally ; Wood, Paul.

In: River Research and Applications, 08.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How freshwater biomonitoring tools vary sub-seasonally reflects temporary river flow regimes

AU - White, James

AU - Armitage, Patrick

AU - Bass, Jon

AU - Chadd, Richard

AU - Hill, Matthew

AU - Mathers, Kate

AU - Little, Sally

AU - Wood, Paul

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - Characterizing temporary river ecosystem responses to flow regimes is vital for conserving their biodiversity and the services they provide to society. However, freshwater biomonitoring tools rarely reflect community responses to hydrological variations or flow cessation events, and those available have not been widely tested within temporary rivers. This study examines two invertebrate biomonitoring tools characterizing community responses to different flow-related properties: the “Drought Effect of Habitat Loss on Invertebrates” (DEHLI) and “Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation” (LIFE), which, respectively reflect community responses to habitat and hydraulic properties associated with changing flow conditions. Sub-seasonal (monthly) variations of LIFE and DEHLI were explored within two groundwater-fed intermittent rivers, one dries sporadically (a flashy, karstic hydrology—River Lathkill) and the other dries seasonally (a highly buffered flow regime—South Winterbourne). Biomonitoring tools were highly sensitive to channel drying and also responded to reduced discharges in permanently flowing reaches. Biomonitoring tools captured ecological recovery patterns in the Lathkill following a supra-seasonal drought. Some unexpected results were observed in the South Winterbourne where LIFE and DEHLI indicated relatively high-flow conditions despite low discharges occurring during some summer months. This probably reflected macrophyte encroachment, which benefitted certain invertebrates (e.g., marginal-dwelling taxa) and highlights the importance of considering instream habitat conditions when interpreting flow regime influences on biomonitoring tools. Although LIFE and DEHLI were positively correlated, the latter responded more clearly to drying events, highlighting that communities respond strongly to the disconnection of instream habitats as flows recede. The results highlighted short-term ecological responses to hydrological variations and the value in adopting sub-seasonal sampling strategies within temporary rivers. Findings from this study indicate the importance of establishing flow response guilds which group taxa that respond comparably to flow cessation events. Such information could be adopted within biomonitoring practices to better characterize temporary river ecosystem responses to hydrological variations.

AB - Characterizing temporary river ecosystem responses to flow regimes is vital for conserving their biodiversity and the services they provide to society. However, freshwater biomonitoring tools rarely reflect community responses to hydrological variations or flow cessation events, and those available have not been widely tested within temporary rivers. This study examines two invertebrate biomonitoring tools characterizing community responses to different flow-related properties: the “Drought Effect of Habitat Loss on Invertebrates” (DEHLI) and “Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation” (LIFE), which, respectively reflect community responses to habitat and hydraulic properties associated with changing flow conditions. Sub-seasonal (monthly) variations of LIFE and DEHLI were explored within two groundwater-fed intermittent rivers, one dries sporadically (a flashy, karstic hydrology—River Lathkill) and the other dries seasonally (a highly buffered flow regime—South Winterbourne). Biomonitoring tools were highly sensitive to channel drying and also responded to reduced discharges in permanently flowing reaches. Biomonitoring tools captured ecological recovery patterns in the Lathkill following a supra-seasonal drought. Some unexpected results were observed in the South Winterbourne where LIFE and DEHLI indicated relatively high-flow conditions despite low discharges occurring during some summer months. This probably reflected macrophyte encroachment, which benefitted certain invertebrates (e.g., marginal-dwelling taxa) and highlights the importance of considering instream habitat conditions when interpreting flow regime influences on biomonitoring tools. Although LIFE and DEHLI were positively correlated, the latter responded more clearly to drying events, highlighting that communities respond strongly to the disconnection of instream habitats as flows recede. The results highlighted short-term ecological responses to hydrological variations and the value in adopting sub-seasonal sampling strategies within temporary rivers. Findings from this study indicate the importance of establishing flow response guilds which group taxa that respond comparably to flow cessation events. Such information could be adopted within biomonitoring practices to better characterize temporary river ecosystem responses to hydrological variations.

KW - Intermittent

KW - Ecology

KW - Flow cessation

KW - Biomonitoring

KW - Intra-annual

KW - ecology

KW - biomonitoring

KW - intermittent

KW - intra-annual

KW - flow cessation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070533673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rra.3501

DO - 10.1002/rra.3501

M3 - Article

JO - River Research and Applications

T2 - River Research and Applications

JF - River Research and Applications

SN - 1535-1459

ER -