Identifying European Moral Consensus

Why are the patent courts reticent to accept empirical evidence in resolving biotechnological cases?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-37
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Intellectual Property Review
Volume28
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{781b37fc9394474ab80dd5fe07eb9655,
title = "Identifying European Moral Consensus: Why are the patent courts reticent to accept empirical evidence in resolving biotechnological cases?",
keywords = "biotechnological inventions, civil evidence, morality, morals and law, patentability, public opinion",
author = "Amanda Warren-Jones",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "26--37",
journal = "European Intellectual Property Review",
issn = "0142-0461",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying European Moral Consensus

T2 - Why are the patent courts reticent to accept empirical evidence in resolving biotechnological cases?

AU - Warren-Jones, Amanda

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

KW - biotechnological inventions

KW - civil evidence

KW - morality

KW - morals and law

KW - patentability

KW - public opinion

UR - https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad832f100000169000a25abc61408ba&docguid=IB70D2540E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB70D2540E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=7&spos=7&epos=7&td=13&crumb-action=append&context=31&resolvein=true

UR - https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=460&productid=7061

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 26

EP - 37

JO - European Intellectual Property Review

JF - European Intellectual Property Review

SN - 0142-0461

IS - 1

ER -