Abstract
People convicted of child sex offences are viewed as a dangerous and demonised offender group, yet little research has considered their resettlement post-residency from Approved Premises. Using data from two qualitative studies carried out 15 years apart, we explore what changes there have been in the discourses and practices with residents convicted of child sex offences. The authors found that whilst rehabilitation and resettlement were contemporarily considered as more holistic endeavours, the primary function of the Approved Premises remains managing the risks of residents convicted of child sex offences. Most significantly, this hindered their social integration into the community.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 159-178 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Probation Journal |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 31 Jan 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''I’m getting out to nothing': A temporal analysis of dominant discourses and practices with residents convicted of child sex offences in probation Approved Premises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver