Impact of integrating disaster risk reduction philosophies into infrastructure reconstruction projects in Sri Lanka

Roshani Palliyaguru, Dilanthi Amaratunga, Richard Haigh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Major impacts on infrastructures due to natural and man-made hazards could result in secondary and additional impacts, compounding the problem for those communities already affected by the hazard. Integration of disaster risk reduction (DRR) philosophies into infrastructure projects has been an important solution to mitigate and prevent such disaster risks, as well as for a speedy recovery after disasters. Vulnerability reduction is defined by the research community as an enabler which facilitates the process of DRR. However, there is a research need to identify the most beneficial DRR strategies that would result in vulnerability reduction in an effective way. As part of this main aim, this paper seeks to explore the nature of various vulnerabilities within infrastructure reconstruction projects and their respective communities and to evaluate the DRR practises within these projects. Finally the paper attempts to map the effects of integration of DRR into infrastructure reconstruction on vulnerability reduction of infrastructure reconstruction projects and the communities which benefited from such projects. This study adopts the case study approach and the paper is entirely based on data collated from semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey conducted within one case study (a water supply and sanitation reconstruction project) in Sri Lanka and expert interviews conducted in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Results reveal that emergency preparedness strategies are the most important group of DRR strategies, while physical/technical strategies are also very important. However, none of the emergency preparedness strategies are satisfactorily implemented, while most of the physical/technical strategies are adequately implemented.

LanguageEnglish
Pages685-700
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Civil Engineering and Management
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disasters
Hazards
Disaster
Sri Lanka
Risk reduction
Sanitation
Water supply
Vulnerability
Recovery

Cite this

@article{5a2143d7dd074767a165fe4987bcf863,
title = "Impact of integrating disaster risk reduction philosophies into infrastructure reconstruction projects in Sri Lanka",
abstract = "Major impacts on infrastructures due to natural and man-made hazards could result in secondary and additional impacts, compounding the problem for those communities already affected by the hazard. Integration of disaster risk reduction (DRR) philosophies into infrastructure projects has been an important solution to mitigate and prevent such disaster risks, as well as for a speedy recovery after disasters. Vulnerability reduction is defined by the research community as an enabler which facilitates the process of DRR. However, there is a research need to identify the most beneficial DRR strategies that would result in vulnerability reduction in an effective way. As part of this main aim, this paper seeks to explore the nature of various vulnerabilities within infrastructure reconstruction projects and their respective communities and to evaluate the DRR practises within these projects. Finally the paper attempts to map the effects of integration of DRR into infrastructure reconstruction on vulnerability reduction of infrastructure reconstruction projects and the communities which benefited from such projects. This study adopts the case study approach and the paper is entirely based on data collated from semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey conducted within one case study (a water supply and sanitation reconstruction project) in Sri Lanka and expert interviews conducted in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Results reveal that emergency preparedness strategies are the most important group of DRR strategies, while physical/technical strategies are also very important. However, none of the emergency preparedness strategies are satisfactorily implemented, while most of the physical/technical strategies are adequately implemented.",
keywords = "community vulnerability, disaster risk reduction, infrastructure reconstruction, infrastructure vulnerability, water supply and sanitation reconstruction projects",
author = "Roshani Palliyaguru and Dilanthi Amaratunga and Richard Haigh",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3846/13923730.2012.723322",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "685--700",
journal = "Journal of Civil Engineering and Management",
issn = "1392-3730",
publisher = "Vilnius Gediminas Technical University",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of integrating disaster risk reduction philosophies into infrastructure reconstruction projects in Sri Lanka

AU - Palliyaguru, Roshani

AU - Amaratunga, Dilanthi

AU - Haigh, Richard

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Major impacts on infrastructures due to natural and man-made hazards could result in secondary and additional impacts, compounding the problem for those communities already affected by the hazard. Integration of disaster risk reduction (DRR) philosophies into infrastructure projects has been an important solution to mitigate and prevent such disaster risks, as well as for a speedy recovery after disasters. Vulnerability reduction is defined by the research community as an enabler which facilitates the process of DRR. However, there is a research need to identify the most beneficial DRR strategies that would result in vulnerability reduction in an effective way. As part of this main aim, this paper seeks to explore the nature of various vulnerabilities within infrastructure reconstruction projects and their respective communities and to evaluate the DRR practises within these projects. Finally the paper attempts to map the effects of integration of DRR into infrastructure reconstruction on vulnerability reduction of infrastructure reconstruction projects and the communities which benefited from such projects. This study adopts the case study approach and the paper is entirely based on data collated from semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey conducted within one case study (a water supply and sanitation reconstruction project) in Sri Lanka and expert interviews conducted in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Results reveal that emergency preparedness strategies are the most important group of DRR strategies, while physical/technical strategies are also very important. However, none of the emergency preparedness strategies are satisfactorily implemented, while most of the physical/technical strategies are adequately implemented.

AB - Major impacts on infrastructures due to natural and man-made hazards could result in secondary and additional impacts, compounding the problem for those communities already affected by the hazard. Integration of disaster risk reduction (DRR) philosophies into infrastructure projects has been an important solution to mitigate and prevent such disaster risks, as well as for a speedy recovery after disasters. Vulnerability reduction is defined by the research community as an enabler which facilitates the process of DRR. However, there is a research need to identify the most beneficial DRR strategies that would result in vulnerability reduction in an effective way. As part of this main aim, this paper seeks to explore the nature of various vulnerabilities within infrastructure reconstruction projects and their respective communities and to evaluate the DRR practises within these projects. Finally the paper attempts to map the effects of integration of DRR into infrastructure reconstruction on vulnerability reduction of infrastructure reconstruction projects and the communities which benefited from such projects. This study adopts the case study approach and the paper is entirely based on data collated from semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey conducted within one case study (a water supply and sanitation reconstruction project) in Sri Lanka and expert interviews conducted in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom. Results reveal that emergency preparedness strategies are the most important group of DRR strategies, while physical/technical strategies are also very important. However, none of the emergency preparedness strategies are satisfactorily implemented, while most of the physical/technical strategies are adequately implemented.

KW - community vulnerability

KW - disaster risk reduction

KW - infrastructure reconstruction

KW - infrastructure vulnerability

KW - water supply and sanitation reconstruction projects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867478793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3846/13923730.2012.723322

DO - 10.3846/13923730.2012.723322

M3 - Review article

VL - 18

SP - 685

EP - 700

JO - Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

T2 - Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

JF - Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

SN - 1392-3730

IS - 5

ER -