Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care: A qualitative study of three primary care trusts

Catherine Walshe, A. Caress, C. Chew-Graham, C. Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been widely adopted within UK general practices, yet there is little understanding of its impact on the provision of community palliative care services. This study presents data on the anticipation and adoption of the GSF within three Primary Care Trusts in North West England. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with generalist and specialist palliative and primary care professionals. Important aspects of the GSF identified were the patient register, communication and out-of-hours protocols. Positive benefits to professionals included improved communication between professionals and appropriate anticipatory prescribing. Negative aspects included increased nursing workload and the possibility of fewer or later visits for patients. Many respondents believed that the GSF needed local champions to be sustainable. Slow or incomplete adoption was reported. The GSF was recognised as important because it facilitated changes to previously difficult aspects of work between professionals, but few respondents reported direct benefits to patient care.

LanguageEnglish
Pages736-743
Number of pages8
JournalPalliative Medicine
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Primary Health Care
Communication
Workload
General Practice
England
Patient Care
Nursing
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{40a2e7adaca74eb4a1af178dcc0f5050,
title = "Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care: A qualitative study of three primary care trusts",
abstract = "The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been widely adopted within UK general practices, yet there is little understanding of its impact on the provision of community palliative care services. This study presents data on the anticipation and adoption of the GSF within three Primary Care Trusts in North West England. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with generalist and specialist palliative and primary care professionals. Important aspects of the GSF identified were the patient register, communication and out-of-hours protocols. Positive benefits to professionals included improved communication between professionals and appropriate anticipatory prescribing. Negative aspects included increased nursing workload and the possibility of fewer or later visits for patients. Many respondents believed that the GSF needed local champions to be sustainable. Slow or incomplete adoption was reported. The GSF was recognised as important because it facilitated changes to previously difficult aspects of work between professionals, but few respondents reported direct benefits to patient care.",
keywords = "Family, Home care services, Interdisciplinary communication, Palliative care, Physicians, Primary health care, Qualitative research",
author = "Catherine Walshe and A. Caress and C. Chew-Graham and C. Todd",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269216308094103",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "736--743",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care : A qualitative study of three primary care trusts. / Walshe, Catherine; Caress, A.; Chew-Graham, C.; Todd, C.

In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 6, 01.09.2008, p. 736-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care

T2 - Palliative Medicine

AU - Walshe, Catherine

AU - Caress, A.

AU - Chew-Graham, C.

AU - Todd, C.

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been widely adopted within UK general practices, yet there is little understanding of its impact on the provision of community palliative care services. This study presents data on the anticipation and adoption of the GSF within three Primary Care Trusts in North West England. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with generalist and specialist palliative and primary care professionals. Important aspects of the GSF identified were the patient register, communication and out-of-hours protocols. Positive benefits to professionals included improved communication between professionals and appropriate anticipatory prescribing. Negative aspects included increased nursing workload and the possibility of fewer or later visits for patients. Many respondents believed that the GSF needed local champions to be sustainable. Slow or incomplete adoption was reported. The GSF was recognised as important because it facilitated changes to previously difficult aspects of work between professionals, but few respondents reported direct benefits to patient care.

AB - The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been widely adopted within UK general practices, yet there is little understanding of its impact on the provision of community palliative care services. This study presents data on the anticipation and adoption of the GSF within three Primary Care Trusts in North West England. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with generalist and specialist palliative and primary care professionals. Important aspects of the GSF identified were the patient register, communication and out-of-hours protocols. Positive benefits to professionals included improved communication between professionals and appropriate anticipatory prescribing. Negative aspects included increased nursing workload and the possibility of fewer or later visits for patients. Many respondents believed that the GSF needed local champions to be sustainable. Slow or incomplete adoption was reported. The GSF was recognised as important because it facilitated changes to previously difficult aspects of work between professionals, but few respondents reported direct benefits to patient care.

KW - Family

KW - Home care services

KW - Interdisciplinary communication

KW - Palliative care

KW - Physicians

KW - Primary health care

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61549121025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269216308094103

DO - 10.1177/0269216308094103

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 736

EP - 743

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 6

ER -