Implementing evidence-based practice in primary care: Perceptions of a multifaceted programme to encourage guideline use

Joyce L. Marshall, Paula Mead, Karen Jones, Evridiki Kaba, Phillip Tovey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To explore the acceptability of the various elements of a multifaceted intervention designed to facilitate the process of guideline implementation by primary care teams and to understand constraints to the use of guidelines in this setting. Design: A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured group interviews. Setting: Primary care. Participants: 34 general practitioners (GPs), six practice nurses and one practice manager were involved in group interviews from ten general practices. Results: The themes identified reflected the elements of the intervention: benefits and problems of critical appraisal workshops; perceptions of the usefulness of guidelines; responses to audit feedback and the impact of facilitation. Even where practitioners were committed to guideline implementation their use was not always straightforward. Aspects such as the maintenance of a good relationship with the patient and the influence of colleagues in secondary care were seen as important. Issues of time and resources were also highlighted. Conclusions: Implementation of clinical guidelines is a complex activity. Interventions used to encourage their use should be flexible and directly relevant to practical issues. Local ownership of the process is important but agreed deadlines for activity may be important to facilitate action.

LanguageEnglish
Pages223-229
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Excellence
Volume4
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Primary Health Care
Guidelines
Interviews
Secondary Care
Ownership
General Practice
General Practitioners
Nurses
Education

Cite this

@article{6fcbdcb7acba4f3ca50711a74d6d502a,
title = "Implementing evidence-based practice in primary care: Perceptions of a multifaceted programme to encourage guideline use",
abstract = "Objective: To explore the acceptability of the various elements of a multifaceted intervention designed to facilitate the process of guideline implementation by primary care teams and to understand constraints to the use of guidelines in this setting. Design: A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured group interviews. Setting: Primary care. Participants: 34 general practitioners (GPs), six practice nurses and one practice manager were involved in group interviews from ten general practices. Results: The themes identified reflected the elements of the intervention: benefits and problems of critical appraisal workshops; perceptions of the usefulness of guidelines; responses to audit feedback and the impact of facilitation. Even where practitioners were committed to guideline implementation their use was not always straightforward. Aspects such as the maintenance of a good relationship with the patient and the influence of colleagues in secondary care were seen as important. Issues of time and resources were also highlighted. Conclusions: Implementation of clinical guidelines is a complex activity. Interventions used to encourage their use should be flexible and directly relevant to practical issues. Local ownership of the process is important but agreed deadlines for activity may be important to facilitate action.",
keywords = "Audit, Clinical effectiveness, Critical appraisal, Evidence-based practice, Guidelines, Practice facilitation",
author = "Marshall, {Joyce L.} and Paula Mead and Karen Jones and Evridiki Kaba and Phillip Tovey",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "223--229",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Excellence",
issn = "1465-9883",
publisher = "Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Implementing evidence-based practice in primary care : Perceptions of a multifaceted programme to encourage guideline use. / Marshall, Joyce L.; Mead, Paula; Jones, Karen; Kaba, Evridiki; Tovey, Phillip.

In: Journal of Clinical Excellence, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.04.2002, p. 223-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing evidence-based practice in primary care

T2 - Journal of Clinical Excellence

AU - Marshall, Joyce L.

AU - Mead, Paula

AU - Jones, Karen

AU - Kaba, Evridiki

AU - Tovey, Phillip

PY - 2002/4/1

Y1 - 2002/4/1

N2 - Objective: To explore the acceptability of the various elements of a multifaceted intervention designed to facilitate the process of guideline implementation by primary care teams and to understand constraints to the use of guidelines in this setting. Design: A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured group interviews. Setting: Primary care. Participants: 34 general practitioners (GPs), six practice nurses and one practice manager were involved in group interviews from ten general practices. Results: The themes identified reflected the elements of the intervention: benefits and problems of critical appraisal workshops; perceptions of the usefulness of guidelines; responses to audit feedback and the impact of facilitation. Even where practitioners were committed to guideline implementation their use was not always straightforward. Aspects such as the maintenance of a good relationship with the patient and the influence of colleagues in secondary care were seen as important. Issues of time and resources were also highlighted. Conclusions: Implementation of clinical guidelines is a complex activity. Interventions used to encourage their use should be flexible and directly relevant to practical issues. Local ownership of the process is important but agreed deadlines for activity may be important to facilitate action.

AB - Objective: To explore the acceptability of the various elements of a multifaceted intervention designed to facilitate the process of guideline implementation by primary care teams and to understand constraints to the use of guidelines in this setting. Design: A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured group interviews. Setting: Primary care. Participants: 34 general practitioners (GPs), six practice nurses and one practice manager were involved in group interviews from ten general practices. Results: The themes identified reflected the elements of the intervention: benefits and problems of critical appraisal workshops; perceptions of the usefulness of guidelines; responses to audit feedback and the impact of facilitation. Even where practitioners were committed to guideline implementation their use was not always straightforward. Aspects such as the maintenance of a good relationship with the patient and the influence of colleagues in secondary care were seen as important. Issues of time and resources were also highlighted. Conclusions: Implementation of clinical guidelines is a complex activity. Interventions used to encourage their use should be flexible and directly relevant to practical issues. Local ownership of the process is important but agreed deadlines for activity may be important to facilitate action.

KW - Audit

KW - Clinical effectiveness

KW - Critical appraisal

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Guidelines

KW - Practice facilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141886983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 223

EP - 229

JO - Journal of Clinical Excellence

JF - Journal of Clinical Excellence

SN - 1465-9883

IS - 2

ER -