In Defence of Safer Spaces

Punk, Privilege and Safer Spaces Policies

Rosemary Lucy Hill, Molly Megson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Increasing attention to the prevalence of sexual harassment at live music events has led to the adoption of safer spaces policies by venues and promoters. Punk’s politics of inclusion and equality suggest that such policies would be welcome as a means to promote access for marginalized groups. However, safer spaces policies are sometimes controversial and their content and implementation patchy. Such policies therefore bear closer examination in order to understand their value and meaning for punk politics. Here we examine the use of safer spaces policies in punk and DIY music spaces asking, how is safety conceptualized, for what purpose, and who benefits from them? We draw on discourse analysis of safer spaces policies and interviews with punks about sexual violence at gigs. We argue that safer spaces policies can be a valuable tool for promoting access to pleasurable experiences whilst lessening fear of discrimination, harassment and violence. However, safer spaces can also continue to privilege already privileged punks. We conclude that when safer spaces policies are implemented they must go hand in hand with practical measures to enable inclusion. In doing so the needs of marginalized groups must be prioritized.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPunk and Post-Punk
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 3 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

privilege
music
inclusion
politics
sexual harassment
discourse analysis
sexual violence
equality
discrimination
Group
violence
anxiety
examination
event
interview
Values
experience
Punk
Safe Space
Privilege

Cite this

@article{b2717dbf52d74b519af0fda82111cfb6,
title = "In Defence of Safer Spaces: Punk, Privilege and Safer Spaces Policies",
abstract = "Increasing attention to the prevalence of sexual harassment at live music events has led to the adoption of safer spaces policies by venues and promoters. Punk’s politics of inclusion and equality suggest that such policies would be welcome as a means to promote access for marginalized groups. However, safer spaces policies are sometimes controversial and their content and implementation patchy. Such policies therefore bear closer examination in order to understand their value and meaning for punk politics. Here we examine the use of safer spaces policies in punk and DIY music spaces asking, how is safety conceptualized, for what purpose, and who benefits from them? We draw on discourse analysis of safer spaces policies and interviews with punks about sexual violence at gigs. We argue that safer spaces policies can be a valuable tool for promoting access to pleasurable experiences whilst lessening fear of discrimination, harassment and violence. However, safer spaces can also continue to privilege already privileged punks. We conclude that when safer spaces policies are implemented they must go hand in hand with practical measures to enable inclusion. In doing so the needs of marginalized groups must be prioritized.",
keywords = "DIY, feminism, politics, punk, queer, safer spaces, sexual violence",
author = "Hill, {Rosemary Lucy} and Molly Megson",
note = "Online ISSN: 2044-3706",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "3",
language = "English",
journal = "Punk and Post-Punk",
issn = "2044-1983",
publisher = "Intellect Ltd.",

}

In Defence of Safer Spaces : Punk, Privilege and Safer Spaces Policies. / Hill, Rosemary Lucy; Megson, Molly.

In: Punk and Post-Punk, 03.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - In Defence of Safer Spaces

T2 - Punk, Privilege and Safer Spaces Policies

AU - Hill, Rosemary Lucy

AU - Megson, Molly

N1 - Online ISSN: 2044-3706

PY - 2019/9/3

Y1 - 2019/9/3

N2 - Increasing attention to the prevalence of sexual harassment at live music events has led to the adoption of safer spaces policies by venues and promoters. Punk’s politics of inclusion and equality suggest that such policies would be welcome as a means to promote access for marginalized groups. However, safer spaces policies are sometimes controversial and their content and implementation patchy. Such policies therefore bear closer examination in order to understand their value and meaning for punk politics. Here we examine the use of safer spaces policies in punk and DIY music spaces asking, how is safety conceptualized, for what purpose, and who benefits from them? We draw on discourse analysis of safer spaces policies and interviews with punks about sexual violence at gigs. We argue that safer spaces policies can be a valuable tool for promoting access to pleasurable experiences whilst lessening fear of discrimination, harassment and violence. However, safer spaces can also continue to privilege already privileged punks. We conclude that when safer spaces policies are implemented they must go hand in hand with practical measures to enable inclusion. In doing so the needs of marginalized groups must be prioritized.

AB - Increasing attention to the prevalence of sexual harassment at live music events has led to the adoption of safer spaces policies by venues and promoters. Punk’s politics of inclusion and equality suggest that such policies would be welcome as a means to promote access for marginalized groups. However, safer spaces policies are sometimes controversial and their content and implementation patchy. Such policies therefore bear closer examination in order to understand their value and meaning for punk politics. Here we examine the use of safer spaces policies in punk and DIY music spaces asking, how is safety conceptualized, for what purpose, and who benefits from them? We draw on discourse analysis of safer spaces policies and interviews with punks about sexual violence at gigs. We argue that safer spaces policies can be a valuable tool for promoting access to pleasurable experiences whilst lessening fear of discrimination, harassment and violence. However, safer spaces can also continue to privilege already privileged punks. We conclude that when safer spaces policies are implemented they must go hand in hand with practical measures to enable inclusion. In doing so the needs of marginalized groups must be prioritized.

KW - DIY

KW - feminism

KW - politics

KW - punk

KW - queer

KW - safer spaces

KW - sexual violence

UR - https://www.intellectbooks.com/punk-post-punk

M3 - Article

JO - Punk and Post-Punk

JF - Punk and Post-Punk

SN - 2044-1983

ER -