Indirect ritual offence

A study on elusive impoliteness

Daniel Kadar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The present chapter examines the phenomenon of indirect ritual offence, which includes cases of recurrent offences that are indirect and as such make it difficult for the targeted person to respond to them. Manifestations of indirect ritual offence include a series of indirect attacks that recurrently target a person, and cases in which the targeted person is recurrently ostracised. While this behaviour has received significant attention is social psychology, it has not been studied in pragmatics and (im)politeness research, in spite of the fact that it is one of the most widely discussed forms of impoliteness behaviour in public discourses. The examination of this phenomenon also contributes to the pragmatic examination of the difference between indirectness and implicitness; as I point out in this chapter, indirect ritual offence becomes implicit from both academic and lay points of view if the frequency of such attacks decreases but the attacks nevertheless continue. In such cases, the targeted person may reinterpret previous attacks as “harmless” and speculate about the nature of new attacks, and even more importantly the abuser can easily claim that they have not intended to offend the other at all – thus, in such cases indirect ritual offence gains an implicit nature. In order to illustrate this point, I examine ways in which “implicit” as an evaluator tends to be metapragmatically used in accounts on indirect ritual offence.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationImplicitness
Subtitle of host publicationFrom lexis to discourse
EditorsPiotr Cap, Marta Dynel
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages177-199
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9789027265487
ISBN (Print)9789027256812
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NamePragmatics & Beyond
PublisherJohn Benjamins
Volume276
ISSN (Print)0922-842X

Fingerprint

religious behavior
offense
human being
pragmatics
examination
politeness
social psychology
discourse
present

Cite this

Kadar, D. (2017). Indirect ritual offence: A study on elusive impoliteness. In P. Cap, & M. Dynel (Eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse (pp. 177-199). (Pragmatics & Beyond; Vol. 276). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.08kad
Kadar, Daniel. / Indirect ritual offence : A study on elusive impoliteness. Implicitness: From lexis to discourse. editor / Piotr Cap ; Marta Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. pp. 177-199 (Pragmatics & Beyond).
@inbook{3f60fa7c98c3446691cf2fe234eaa1d9,
title = "Indirect ritual offence: A study on elusive impoliteness",
abstract = "The present chapter examines the phenomenon of indirect ritual offence, which includes cases of recurrent offences that are indirect and as such make it difficult for the targeted person to respond to them. Manifestations of indirect ritual offence include a series of indirect attacks that recurrently target a person, and cases in which the targeted person is recurrently ostracised. While this behaviour has received significant attention is social psychology, it has not been studied in pragmatics and (im)politeness research, in spite of the fact that it is one of the most widely discussed forms of impoliteness behaviour in public discourses. The examination of this phenomenon also contributes to the pragmatic examination of the difference between indirectness and implicitness; as I point out in this chapter, indirect ritual offence becomes implicit from both academic and lay points of view if the frequency of such attacks decreases but the attacks nevertheless continue. In such cases, the targeted person may reinterpret previous attacks as “harmless” and speculate about the nature of new attacks, and even more importantly the abuser can easily claim that they have not intended to offend the other at all – thus, in such cases indirect ritual offence gains an implicit nature. In order to illustrate this point, I examine ways in which “implicit” as an evaluator tends to be metapragmatically used in accounts on indirect ritual offence.",
keywords = "implicitness, frequency, impoliteness and offense, indirectness, metapragmatics",
author = "Daniel Kadar",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1075/pbns.276.08kad",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027256812",
series = "Pragmatics & Beyond",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
pages = "177--199",
editor = "Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel",
booktitle = "Implicitness",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Kadar, D 2017, Indirect ritual offence: A study on elusive impoliteness. in P Cap & M Dynel (eds), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse. Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 276, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.08kad

Indirect ritual offence : A study on elusive impoliteness. / Kadar, Daniel.

Implicitness: From lexis to discourse. ed. / Piotr Cap; Marta Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. p. 177-199 (Pragmatics & Beyond; Vol. 276).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Indirect ritual offence

T2 - A study on elusive impoliteness

AU - Kadar, Daniel

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The present chapter examines the phenomenon of indirect ritual offence, which includes cases of recurrent offences that are indirect and as such make it difficult for the targeted person to respond to them. Manifestations of indirect ritual offence include a series of indirect attacks that recurrently target a person, and cases in which the targeted person is recurrently ostracised. While this behaviour has received significant attention is social psychology, it has not been studied in pragmatics and (im)politeness research, in spite of the fact that it is one of the most widely discussed forms of impoliteness behaviour in public discourses. The examination of this phenomenon also contributes to the pragmatic examination of the difference between indirectness and implicitness; as I point out in this chapter, indirect ritual offence becomes implicit from both academic and lay points of view if the frequency of such attacks decreases but the attacks nevertheless continue. In such cases, the targeted person may reinterpret previous attacks as “harmless” and speculate about the nature of new attacks, and even more importantly the abuser can easily claim that they have not intended to offend the other at all – thus, in such cases indirect ritual offence gains an implicit nature. In order to illustrate this point, I examine ways in which “implicit” as an evaluator tends to be metapragmatically used in accounts on indirect ritual offence.

AB - The present chapter examines the phenomenon of indirect ritual offence, which includes cases of recurrent offences that are indirect and as such make it difficult for the targeted person to respond to them. Manifestations of indirect ritual offence include a series of indirect attacks that recurrently target a person, and cases in which the targeted person is recurrently ostracised. While this behaviour has received significant attention is social psychology, it has not been studied in pragmatics and (im)politeness research, in spite of the fact that it is one of the most widely discussed forms of impoliteness behaviour in public discourses. The examination of this phenomenon also contributes to the pragmatic examination of the difference between indirectness and implicitness; as I point out in this chapter, indirect ritual offence becomes implicit from both academic and lay points of view if the frequency of such attacks decreases but the attacks nevertheless continue. In such cases, the targeted person may reinterpret previous attacks as “harmless” and speculate about the nature of new attacks, and even more importantly the abuser can easily claim that they have not intended to offend the other at all – thus, in such cases indirect ritual offence gains an implicit nature. In order to illustrate this point, I examine ways in which “implicit” as an evaluator tends to be metapragmatically used in accounts on indirect ritual offence.

KW - implicitness

KW - frequency

KW - impoliteness and offense

KW - indirectness

KW - metapragmatics

U2 - 10.1075/pbns.276.08kad

DO - 10.1075/pbns.276.08kad

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789027256812

T3 - Pragmatics & Beyond

SP - 177

EP - 199

BT - Implicitness

A2 - Cap, Piotr

A2 - Dynel, Marta

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

ER -

Kadar D. Indirect ritual offence: A study on elusive impoliteness. In Cap P, Dynel M, editors, Implicitness: From lexis to discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2017. p. 177-199. (Pragmatics & Beyond). https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.08kad