Individualisation and social exclusion: the case of young people not in education, employment or training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The characteristics, experiences and long-term prospects of young people outside the labour market and education have attracted widespread international attention in recent decades, and the specific category of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) has been a policy concern for the UK Government since 1997. This paper examines the analytical and empirical basis of our knowledge of NEET young people, in the light of more general conceptualisations of social exclusion and the individualisation of social risk. It relates the NEET category to a conception of social exclusion in which the central policy focus is on moving young people across a boundary between participation and non-participation, and inequalities within education and employment receive less attention. This focus, allied with discourses of individualisation, obscures the structural basis of inequality in education and training. However, the paper argues that the research evidence shows that individualised approaches based on personal and cultural characteristics of NEET young people are inadequate to understand this group and frame policy. The paper proposes that stronger versions of social exclusion need to be used in constructing solutions which acknowledge the basis of NEET issues in wider social inequalities
LanguageEnglish
Pages785-802
Number of pages18
JournalOxford Review of Education
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

individualization
exclusion
education
social inequality
labor market
participation
discourse

Cite this

@article{40ee1a4a2868418fbdb7f763ea474e1f,
title = "Individualisation and social exclusion: the case of young people not in education, employment or training",
abstract = "The characteristics, experiences and long-term prospects of young people outside the labour market and education have attracted widespread international attention in recent decades, and the specific category of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) has been a policy concern for the UK Government since 1997. This paper examines the analytical and empirical basis of our knowledge of NEET young people, in the light of more general conceptualisations of social exclusion and the individualisation of social risk. It relates the NEET category to a conception of social exclusion in which the central policy focus is on moving young people across a boundary between participation and non-participation, and inequalities within education and employment receive less attention. This focus, allied with discourses of individualisation, obscures the structural basis of inequality in education and training. However, the paper argues that the research evidence shows that individualised approaches based on personal and cultural characteristics of NEET young people are inadequate to understand this group and frame policy. The paper proposes that stronger versions of social exclusion need to be used in constructing solutions which acknowledge the basis of NEET issues in wider social inequalities",
author = "Ron Thompson",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03054985.2011.636507",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "785--802",
journal = "Oxford Review of Education",
issn = "0305-4985",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Individualisation and social exclusion : the case of young people not in education, employment or training. / Thompson, Ron.

In: Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 785-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individualisation and social exclusion

T2 - Oxford Review of Education

AU - Thompson, Ron

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The characteristics, experiences and long-term prospects of young people outside the labour market and education have attracted widespread international attention in recent decades, and the specific category of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) has been a policy concern for the UK Government since 1997. This paper examines the analytical and empirical basis of our knowledge of NEET young people, in the light of more general conceptualisations of social exclusion and the individualisation of social risk. It relates the NEET category to a conception of social exclusion in which the central policy focus is on moving young people across a boundary between participation and non-participation, and inequalities within education and employment receive less attention. This focus, allied with discourses of individualisation, obscures the structural basis of inequality in education and training. However, the paper argues that the research evidence shows that individualised approaches based on personal and cultural characteristics of NEET young people are inadequate to understand this group and frame policy. The paper proposes that stronger versions of social exclusion need to be used in constructing solutions which acknowledge the basis of NEET issues in wider social inequalities

AB - The characteristics, experiences and long-term prospects of young people outside the labour market and education have attracted widespread international attention in recent decades, and the specific category of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) has been a policy concern for the UK Government since 1997. This paper examines the analytical and empirical basis of our knowledge of NEET young people, in the light of more general conceptualisations of social exclusion and the individualisation of social risk. It relates the NEET category to a conception of social exclusion in which the central policy focus is on moving young people across a boundary between participation and non-participation, and inequalities within education and employment receive less attention. This focus, allied with discourses of individualisation, obscures the structural basis of inequality in education and training. However, the paper argues that the research evidence shows that individualised approaches based on personal and cultural characteristics of NEET young people are inadequate to understand this group and frame policy. The paper proposes that stronger versions of social exclusion need to be used in constructing solutions which acknowledge the basis of NEET issues in wider social inequalities

U2 - 10.1080/03054985.2011.636507

DO - 10.1080/03054985.2011.636507

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 785

EP - 802

JO - Oxford Review of Education

JF - Oxford Review of Education

SN - 0305-4985

IS - 6

ER -