Abstract
This paper explores variations in the pattern of colliery level industrial relations following the privatization of British Coal in four pits operated by the largest coal mining company in the UK. Differences are explained in terms of the competing institutions representing mineworkers and, most significantly, in relation to whether the mode of acquisition of the colliery required the management to maintain existing terms and conditions as a result of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 565-583 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | British Journal of Industrial Relations |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Dec 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Industrial Relations in Privatized UK Mining: A Contingency Strategy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Wallis, E., & Winterton, J. (2001). Industrial Relations in Privatized UK Mining: A Contingency Strategy? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(4), 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00215