Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation

Michael Hermann Bardorf, Bernd Jäger, Eric Boeckmans, Axel Kramer, Ojan Assadian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Medical examination gloves and surgical gloves protect the wearer directly and the patient indirectly from the risk of contamination. Because of concerns related to latex allergy, an increasing trend toward the use of synthetic gloves made of materials other than latex is observable. However, currently it is unknown if the physical properties of different materials may influence bacterial passage in case of a glove puncture. Methods We examined 9 different medical examination gloves from various manufacturers made of nitrile (n = 4), latex (n = 3), or neoprene (n = 2). Additionally, 1 latex surgical glove each with and without antibacterial chlorhexidine gluconate coating and 1 synthetic surgical glove made of thermoplastic elastomer were included in the experiments. The studied materials were perforated following a standardized procedure, and direct bacterial passage was measured under dynamic conditions. Glove elasticity at 1 cm up to 2.5 cm elongation was measured following EN 455-2. Results Nitrile gloves demonstrated higher material stiffness compared with latex gloves. Medical examination gloves made of nitrile and neoprene showed a 10-fold higher bacterial passage through a standardized puncture compared with latex gloves. All surgical gloves showed a lower bacterial passage compared with the tested examination gloves. Conclusion Bacterial passage through punctures is correlated with the stiffness or elasticity of the glove material. Therefore, gloves made of latex may have an increased protective effect in case of a glove breach. Whenever gloves are purchased and selected, a risk-benefit assessment should be conducted, balancing the risk of allergy against the degree of required protection in case of a glove puncture.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1645-1649
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume44
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Latex
Surgical Gloves
Punctures
Nitriles
Neoprene
Elasticity
Latex Hypersensitivity
Elastomers
Hypersensitivity

Cite this

Bardorf, Michael Hermann ; Jäger, Bernd ; Boeckmans, Eric ; Kramer, Axel ; Assadian, Ojan. / Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 12. pp. 1645-1649.
@article{1efa96b2c0d1479796dd914cdc334499,
title = "Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation",
abstract = "Background Medical examination gloves and surgical gloves protect the wearer directly and the patient indirectly from the risk of contamination. Because of concerns related to latex allergy, an increasing trend toward the use of synthetic gloves made of materials other than latex is observable. However, currently it is unknown if the physical properties of different materials may influence bacterial passage in case of a glove puncture. Methods We examined 9 different medical examination gloves from various manufacturers made of nitrile (n = 4), latex (n = 3), or neoprene (n = 2). Additionally, 1 latex surgical glove each with and without antibacterial chlorhexidine gluconate coating and 1 synthetic surgical glove made of thermoplastic elastomer were included in the experiments. The studied materials were perforated following a standardized procedure, and direct bacterial passage was measured under dynamic conditions. Glove elasticity at 1 cm up to 2.5 cm elongation was measured following EN 455-2. Results Nitrile gloves demonstrated higher material stiffness compared with latex gloves. Medical examination gloves made of nitrile and neoprene showed a 10-fold higher bacterial passage through a standardized puncture compared with latex gloves. All surgical gloves showed a lower bacterial passage compared with the tested examination gloves. Conclusion Bacterial passage through punctures is correlated with the stiffness or elasticity of the glove material. Therefore, gloves made of latex may have an increased protective effect in case of a glove breach. Whenever gloves are purchased and selected, a risk-benefit assessment should be conducted, balancing the risk of allergy against the degree of required protection in case of a glove puncture.",
keywords = "Bacterial passage, Latex, Nitrile, Perforation",
author = "Bardorf, {Michael Hermann} and Bernd J{\"a}ger and Eric Boeckmans and Axel Kramer and Ojan Assadian",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.070",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1645--1649",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "12",

}

Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation. / Bardorf, Michael Hermann; Jäger, Bernd; Boeckmans, Eric; Kramer, Axel; Assadian, Ojan.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 44, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1645-1649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation

AU - Bardorf, Michael Hermann

AU - Jäger, Bernd

AU - Boeckmans, Eric

AU - Kramer, Axel

AU - Assadian, Ojan

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background Medical examination gloves and surgical gloves protect the wearer directly and the patient indirectly from the risk of contamination. Because of concerns related to latex allergy, an increasing trend toward the use of synthetic gloves made of materials other than latex is observable. However, currently it is unknown if the physical properties of different materials may influence bacterial passage in case of a glove puncture. Methods We examined 9 different medical examination gloves from various manufacturers made of nitrile (n = 4), latex (n = 3), or neoprene (n = 2). Additionally, 1 latex surgical glove each with and without antibacterial chlorhexidine gluconate coating and 1 synthetic surgical glove made of thermoplastic elastomer were included in the experiments. The studied materials were perforated following a standardized procedure, and direct bacterial passage was measured under dynamic conditions. Glove elasticity at 1 cm up to 2.5 cm elongation was measured following EN 455-2. Results Nitrile gloves demonstrated higher material stiffness compared with latex gloves. Medical examination gloves made of nitrile and neoprene showed a 10-fold higher bacterial passage through a standardized puncture compared with latex gloves. All surgical gloves showed a lower bacterial passage compared with the tested examination gloves. Conclusion Bacterial passage through punctures is correlated with the stiffness or elasticity of the glove material. Therefore, gloves made of latex may have an increased protective effect in case of a glove breach. Whenever gloves are purchased and selected, a risk-benefit assessment should be conducted, balancing the risk of allergy against the degree of required protection in case of a glove puncture.

AB - Background Medical examination gloves and surgical gloves protect the wearer directly and the patient indirectly from the risk of contamination. Because of concerns related to latex allergy, an increasing trend toward the use of synthetic gloves made of materials other than latex is observable. However, currently it is unknown if the physical properties of different materials may influence bacterial passage in case of a glove puncture. Methods We examined 9 different medical examination gloves from various manufacturers made of nitrile (n = 4), latex (n = 3), or neoprene (n = 2). Additionally, 1 latex surgical glove each with and without antibacterial chlorhexidine gluconate coating and 1 synthetic surgical glove made of thermoplastic elastomer were included in the experiments. The studied materials were perforated following a standardized procedure, and direct bacterial passage was measured under dynamic conditions. Glove elasticity at 1 cm up to 2.5 cm elongation was measured following EN 455-2. Results Nitrile gloves demonstrated higher material stiffness compared with latex gloves. Medical examination gloves made of nitrile and neoprene showed a 10-fold higher bacterial passage through a standardized puncture compared with latex gloves. All surgical gloves showed a lower bacterial passage compared with the tested examination gloves. Conclusion Bacterial passage through punctures is correlated with the stiffness or elasticity of the glove material. Therefore, gloves made of latex may have an increased protective effect in case of a glove breach. Whenever gloves are purchased and selected, a risk-benefit assessment should be conducted, balancing the risk of allergy against the degree of required protection in case of a glove puncture.

KW - Bacterial passage

KW - Latex

KW - Nitrile

KW - Perforation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977111266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.070

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.070

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1645

EP - 1649

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

T2 - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 12

ER -