Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years

John Ntema, Ruth Massey, Lochner Marais, Jan Cloete, Molefi Lenka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on informal settlement upgrading tends to focus on one-off case studies. This article investigates the changing experiences, over nearly 25 years, of people living in an upgraded informal settlement. We sought to determine how the perceptions of the residents of Freedom Square changed. Our latest survey (2014) included responses from 199 household representatives and followed earlier surveys. Firstly, we find that the upgrading of Freedom Square represents a first step towards ensuring the housing rights of black people in urban South Africa. Secondly, spatial infilling and locational advantage continue to play valuable roles. Thirdly, dweller control, in terms of which residents themselves are able to design extensions to their houses, remains important. Fourthly, social cohesion among community members is proving to be more important than access to a stand. Fifthly, urban management remains an important long-term requirement. Lastly, elements of informality persist in the area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-479
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Urbanism
Volume11
Issue number4
Early online date14 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

informal settlement
resident
black population
social cohesion
role play
cohesion
housing
management
community
experience
freedom
Africa
rights
household
urban management

Cite this

Ntema, John ; Massey, Ruth ; Marais, Lochner ; Cloete, Jan ; Lenka, Molefi. / Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa : beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years. In: Journal of Urbanism. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 460-479.
@article{b634e80095d146c78402d5e8413e3fdd,
title = "Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years",
abstract = "Research on informal settlement upgrading tends to focus on one-off case studies. This article investigates the changing experiences, over nearly 25 years, of people living in an upgraded informal settlement. We sought to determine how the perceptions of the residents of Freedom Square changed. Our latest survey (2014) included responses from 199 household representatives and followed earlier surveys. Firstly, we find that the upgrading of Freedom Square represents a first step towards ensuring the housing rights of black people in urban South Africa. Secondly, spatial infilling and locational advantage continue to play valuable roles. Thirdly, dweller control, in terms of which residents themselves are able to design extensions to their houses, remains important. Fourthly, social cohesion among community members is proving to be more important than access to a stand. Fifthly, urban management remains an important long-term requirement. Lastly, elements of informality persist in the area.",
keywords = "Informal settlement upgrading, housing policy, respondent experiences, social mobility, living environment, dweller control",
author = "John Ntema and Ruth Massey and Lochner Marais and Jan Cloete and Molefi Lenka",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/17549175.2018.1484792",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "460--479",
journal = "Journal of Urbanism",
issn = "1754-9175",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa : beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years. / Ntema, John; Massey, Ruth; Marais, Lochner; Cloete, Jan; Lenka, Molefi.

In: Journal of Urbanism, Vol. 11, No. 4, 16.06.2018, p. 460-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa

T2 - beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years

AU - Ntema, John

AU - Massey, Ruth

AU - Marais, Lochner

AU - Cloete, Jan

AU - Lenka, Molefi

PY - 2018/6/16

Y1 - 2018/6/16

N2 - Research on informal settlement upgrading tends to focus on one-off case studies. This article investigates the changing experiences, over nearly 25 years, of people living in an upgraded informal settlement. We sought to determine how the perceptions of the residents of Freedom Square changed. Our latest survey (2014) included responses from 199 household representatives and followed earlier surveys. Firstly, we find that the upgrading of Freedom Square represents a first step towards ensuring the housing rights of black people in urban South Africa. Secondly, spatial infilling and locational advantage continue to play valuable roles. Thirdly, dweller control, in terms of which residents themselves are able to design extensions to their houses, remains important. Fourthly, social cohesion among community members is proving to be more important than access to a stand. Fifthly, urban management remains an important long-term requirement. Lastly, elements of informality persist in the area.

AB - Research on informal settlement upgrading tends to focus on one-off case studies. This article investigates the changing experiences, over nearly 25 years, of people living in an upgraded informal settlement. We sought to determine how the perceptions of the residents of Freedom Square changed. Our latest survey (2014) included responses from 199 household representatives and followed earlier surveys. Firstly, we find that the upgrading of Freedom Square represents a first step towards ensuring the housing rights of black people in urban South Africa. Secondly, spatial infilling and locational advantage continue to play valuable roles. Thirdly, dweller control, in terms of which residents themselves are able to design extensions to their houses, remains important. Fourthly, social cohesion among community members is proving to be more important than access to a stand. Fifthly, urban management remains an important long-term requirement. Lastly, elements of informality persist in the area.

KW - Informal settlement upgrading

KW - housing policy

KW - respondent experiences

KW - social mobility

KW - living environment

KW - dweller control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048816848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17549175.2018.1484792

DO - 10.1080/17549175.2018.1484792

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048816848

VL - 11

SP - 460

EP - 479

JO - Journal of Urbanism

JF - Journal of Urbanism

SN - 1754-9175

IS - 4

ER -