Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years

John Ntema, Ruth Massey, Lochner Marais, Jan Cloete, Molefi Lenka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research on informal settlement upgrading tends to focus on one-off case studies. This article investigates the changing experiences, over nearly 25 years, of people living in an upgraded informal settlement. We sought to determine how the perceptions of the residents of Freedom Square changed. Our latest survey (2014) included responses from 199 household representatives and followed earlier surveys. Firstly, we find that the upgrading of Freedom Square represents a first step towards ensuring the housing rights of black people in urban South Africa. Secondly, spatial infilling and locational advantage continue to play valuable roles. Thirdly, dweller control, in terms of which residents themselves are able to design extensions to their houses, remains important. Fourthly, social cohesion among community members is proving to be more important than access to a stand. Fifthly, urban management remains an important long-term requirement. Lastly, elements of informality persist in the area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-479
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Urbanism
Volume11
Issue number4
Early online date14 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: beneficiaries’ perceptions over nearly twenty-five years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this