Informality in organization and research

A review and a proposal

John Alfred Rooke, Lauri Koskela, Mike Kagioglou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The growing interest in informal and emergent features of organizations has accompanied changes in both the dominant forms of organization and prevailing academic views about how best to think about and research them. It is argued here that currently espoused dichotomous characterizations of both organizations and research approaches are over-simplified and misleading. A review of types of organization research is conducted and it is suggested that the relationship between theory and data collection provides a more detailed and illuminating taxonomy than a distinction between qualitative and quantitative research. Two major distinctions are proposed: (1) between theory driven and phenomenon driven research; (2) between descriptive and prescriptive theory. It is suggested that organization theory is properly prescriptive in nature. The place of informality in organization and management studies is explicated, drawing on insights from Wittgenstein and ethnomethodology (EM). A distinction is drawn between (1) the degree of formality in particular organizational settings; and (2) the necessarily informal foundations of formal organizational schemes and methods. Finally, the organization of research itself is addressed. A prescriptive theory (TFV) is suggested as a means of organizing and explaining the research process. This suggestion serves as both (1) a proposal for research management; and (2) an illustration of the relationship between theory and organization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)913-922
Number of pages10
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume27
Issue number10
Early online date23 Nov 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Informality
Taxonomies
Data collection
Research management
Organization theory
Management studies
Qualitative research
Research organization
Organization studies
Taxonomy
Organizing
Quantitative research
Process research
Ethnomethodology

Cite this

@article{ea193530fb6e41a9a66f47da923a5a3b,
title = "Informality in organization and research: A review and a proposal",
abstract = "The growing interest in informal and emergent features of organizations has accompanied changes in both the dominant forms of organization and prevailing academic views about how best to think about and research them. It is argued here that currently espoused dichotomous characterizations of both organizations and research approaches are over-simplified and misleading. A review of types of organization research is conducted and it is suggested that the relationship between theory and data collection provides a more detailed and illuminating taxonomy than a distinction between qualitative and quantitative research. Two major distinctions are proposed: (1) between theory driven and phenomenon driven research; (2) between descriptive and prescriptive theory. It is suggested that organization theory is properly prescriptive in nature. The place of informality in organization and management studies is explicated, drawing on insights from Wittgenstein and ethnomethodology (EM). A distinction is drawn between (1) the degree of formality in particular organizational settings; and (2) the necessarily informal foundations of formal organizational schemes and methods. Finally, the organization of research itself is addressed. A prescriptive theory (TFV) is suggested as a means of organizing and explaining the research process. This suggestion serves as both (1) a proposal for research management; and (2) an illustration of the relationship between theory and organization.",
keywords = "Organization theory, Organizational analysis, Production process, Research methods, Research policy",
author = "Rooke, {John Alfred} and Lauri Koskela and Mike Kagioglou",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01446190903273950",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "913--922",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Informality in organization and research : A review and a proposal. / Rooke, John Alfred; Koskela, Lauri; Kagioglou, Mike.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 10, 01.12.2009, p. 913-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informality in organization and research

T2 - A review and a proposal

AU - Rooke, John Alfred

AU - Koskela, Lauri

AU - Kagioglou, Mike

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - The growing interest in informal and emergent features of organizations has accompanied changes in both the dominant forms of organization and prevailing academic views about how best to think about and research them. It is argued here that currently espoused dichotomous characterizations of both organizations and research approaches are over-simplified and misleading. A review of types of organization research is conducted and it is suggested that the relationship between theory and data collection provides a more detailed and illuminating taxonomy than a distinction between qualitative and quantitative research. Two major distinctions are proposed: (1) between theory driven and phenomenon driven research; (2) between descriptive and prescriptive theory. It is suggested that organization theory is properly prescriptive in nature. The place of informality in organization and management studies is explicated, drawing on insights from Wittgenstein and ethnomethodology (EM). A distinction is drawn between (1) the degree of formality in particular organizational settings; and (2) the necessarily informal foundations of formal organizational schemes and methods. Finally, the organization of research itself is addressed. A prescriptive theory (TFV) is suggested as a means of organizing and explaining the research process. This suggestion serves as both (1) a proposal for research management; and (2) an illustration of the relationship between theory and organization.

AB - The growing interest in informal and emergent features of organizations has accompanied changes in both the dominant forms of organization and prevailing academic views about how best to think about and research them. It is argued here that currently espoused dichotomous characterizations of both organizations and research approaches are over-simplified and misleading. A review of types of organization research is conducted and it is suggested that the relationship between theory and data collection provides a more detailed and illuminating taxonomy than a distinction between qualitative and quantitative research. Two major distinctions are proposed: (1) between theory driven and phenomenon driven research; (2) between descriptive and prescriptive theory. It is suggested that organization theory is properly prescriptive in nature. The place of informality in organization and management studies is explicated, drawing on insights from Wittgenstein and ethnomethodology (EM). A distinction is drawn between (1) the degree of formality in particular organizational settings; and (2) the necessarily informal foundations of formal organizational schemes and methods. Finally, the organization of research itself is addressed. A prescriptive theory (TFV) is suggested as a means of organizing and explaining the research process. This suggestion serves as both (1) a proposal for research management; and (2) an illustration of the relationship between theory and organization.

KW - Organization theory

KW - Organizational analysis

KW - Production process

KW - Research methods

KW - Research policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77449144752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446190903273950

DO - 10.1080/01446190903273950

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 913

EP - 922

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 10

ER -