Innovation, Embeddedness, and Policy: Evidence from Life Sciences in Three UK Regions

Edward Kasabov, Rick Delbridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper draws upon a survey of the life science and biotechnology regions of Oxford, Central Scotland and South West England to examine the innovation and embeddedness traits of the regions. The insights into the compositional weaknesses and strengths of the regions suggest opportunities and threats for the future development of the UK's life sciences and biotechnology. The discussion moves forward debates on biotechnology, regional innovation, regional economic development and policy by posing research questions relating to the gap of knowledge of two under-researched regions, the need for a differentiated view of regions and a public policy approach tailored towards them, as well as the prospects of ‘engineering’ high-tech regions. Some of the highlighted policy challenges are common to the three regions, while others are region-specific and reflect the variations of regional make-up and stage of development.
LanguageEnglish
Pages185-200
Number of pages16
JournalTechnology Analysis and Strategic Management
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date14 Mar 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Embeddedness
Life sciences
Innovation
Biotechnology
High-tech
Stages of development
Regional economic development
Threat
Scotland
Economic policy
England
Public policy
Regional innovation

Cite this

@article{c4fcb97907e94f91a185a76e675f025c,
title = "Innovation, Embeddedness, and Policy: Evidence from Life Sciences in Three UK Regions",
abstract = "This paper draws upon a survey of the life science and biotechnology regions of Oxford, Central Scotland and South West England to examine the innovation and embeddedness traits of the regions. The insights into the compositional weaknesses and strengths of the regions suggest opportunities and threats for the future development of the UK's life sciences and biotechnology. The discussion moves forward debates on biotechnology, regional innovation, regional economic development and policy by posing research questions relating to the gap of knowledge of two under-researched regions, the need for a differentiated view of regions and a public policy approach tailored towards them, as well as the prospects of ‘engineering’ high-tech regions. Some of the highlighted policy challenges are common to the three regions, while others are region-specific and reflect the variations of regional make-up and stage of development.",
keywords = "biotechnology, clusters, regional development, innovation, networks",
author = "Edward Kasabov and Rick Delbridge",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09537320801931671",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "185--200",
journal = "Technology Analysis and Strategic Management",
issn = "0953-7325",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Innovation, Embeddedness, and Policy : Evidence from Life Sciences in Three UK Regions. / Kasabov, Edward; Delbridge, Rick.

In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2008, p. 185-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation, Embeddedness, and Policy

T2 - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

AU - Kasabov, Edward

AU - Delbridge, Rick

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - This paper draws upon a survey of the life science and biotechnology regions of Oxford, Central Scotland and South West England to examine the innovation and embeddedness traits of the regions. The insights into the compositional weaknesses and strengths of the regions suggest opportunities and threats for the future development of the UK's life sciences and biotechnology. The discussion moves forward debates on biotechnology, regional innovation, regional economic development and policy by posing research questions relating to the gap of knowledge of two under-researched regions, the need for a differentiated view of regions and a public policy approach tailored towards them, as well as the prospects of ‘engineering’ high-tech regions. Some of the highlighted policy challenges are common to the three regions, while others are region-specific and reflect the variations of regional make-up and stage of development.

AB - This paper draws upon a survey of the life science and biotechnology regions of Oxford, Central Scotland and South West England to examine the innovation and embeddedness traits of the regions. The insights into the compositional weaknesses and strengths of the regions suggest opportunities and threats for the future development of the UK's life sciences and biotechnology. The discussion moves forward debates on biotechnology, regional innovation, regional economic development and policy by posing research questions relating to the gap of knowledge of two under-researched regions, the need for a differentiated view of regions and a public policy approach tailored towards them, as well as the prospects of ‘engineering’ high-tech regions. Some of the highlighted policy challenges are common to the three regions, while others are region-specific and reflect the variations of regional make-up and stage of development.

KW - biotechnology

KW - clusters

KW - regional development

KW - innovation

KW - networks

U2 - 10.1080/09537320801931671

DO - 10.1080/09537320801931671

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 185

EP - 200

JO - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

JF - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

SN - 0953-7325

IS - 2

ER -