Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets

Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience

Vikrant Shirodkar, Palitha Konara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Institutional distance has been known to be an important driver of Multinational Enterprises’ strategies and performance in host countries. Based on a large panel dataset of 10562 firms operating in 17 emerging markets and spanning 80 home countries, we re-examine the relationship described by Gaur and Lu (2007) between regulatory institutional distance and subsidiary performance. We extend this research by (1) examining this relationship in the context of emerging markets, (2) examining the moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience within the context of emerging markets and (3) accounting for a greater variety of institutions by including a large number of home and host countries. We find that institutional distance negatively affects subsidiary performance in emerging markets. Our findings also show that the negative effects of institutional distance on subsidiary performance are lesser for subsidiaries with partial ownership (than for subsidiaries with full ownership) and for subsidiaries with greater host-country experience. We discuss our findings with respect to Gaur and Lu’s model, which explores the relationships between these variables in a general context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-207
Number of pages29
JournalManagement International Review
Volume57
Issue number2
Early online date19 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Host country
Ownership
Subsidiary performance
Foreign subsidiaries
Emerging markets
Moderating effect
Subsidiaries
Home country
Multinational enterprises

Cite this

@article{9e3948d080c9498a87da45b61038ed13,
title = "Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets: Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience",
abstract = "Institutional distance has been known to be an important driver of Multinational Enterprises’ strategies and performance in host countries. Based on a large panel dataset of 10562 firms operating in 17 emerging markets and spanning 80 home countries, we re-examine the relationship described by Gaur and Lu (2007) between regulatory institutional distance and subsidiary performance. We extend this research by (1) examining this relationship in the context of emerging markets, (2) examining the moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience within the context of emerging markets and (3) accounting for a greater variety of institutions by including a large number of home and host countries. We find that institutional distance negatively affects subsidiary performance in emerging markets. Our findings also show that the negative effects of institutional distance on subsidiary performance are lesser for subsidiaries with partial ownership (than for subsidiaries with full ownership) and for subsidiaries with greater host-country experience. We discuss our findings with respect to Gaur and Lu’s model, which explores the relationships between these variables in a general context.",
keywords = "Emerging markets, Institutional distance, Subsidiary performance, Multinational enterprises",
author = "Vikrant Shirodkar and Palitha Konara",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11575-016-0301-z",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "179--207",
journal = "Management International Review",
issn = "0938-8249",
publisher = "Gabler Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets : Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience. / Shirodkar, Vikrant; Konara, Palitha.

In: Management International Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 04.2017, p. 179-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets

T2 - Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience

AU - Shirodkar, Vikrant

AU - Konara, Palitha

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Institutional distance has been known to be an important driver of Multinational Enterprises’ strategies and performance in host countries. Based on a large panel dataset of 10562 firms operating in 17 emerging markets and spanning 80 home countries, we re-examine the relationship described by Gaur and Lu (2007) between regulatory institutional distance and subsidiary performance. We extend this research by (1) examining this relationship in the context of emerging markets, (2) examining the moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience within the context of emerging markets and (3) accounting for a greater variety of institutions by including a large number of home and host countries. We find that institutional distance negatively affects subsidiary performance in emerging markets. Our findings also show that the negative effects of institutional distance on subsidiary performance are lesser for subsidiaries with partial ownership (than for subsidiaries with full ownership) and for subsidiaries with greater host-country experience. We discuss our findings with respect to Gaur and Lu’s model, which explores the relationships between these variables in a general context.

AB - Institutional distance has been known to be an important driver of Multinational Enterprises’ strategies and performance in host countries. Based on a large panel dataset of 10562 firms operating in 17 emerging markets and spanning 80 home countries, we re-examine the relationship described by Gaur and Lu (2007) between regulatory institutional distance and subsidiary performance. We extend this research by (1) examining this relationship in the context of emerging markets, (2) examining the moderating effects of ownership strategy and host-country experience within the context of emerging markets and (3) accounting for a greater variety of institutions by including a large number of home and host countries. We find that institutional distance negatively affects subsidiary performance in emerging markets. Our findings also show that the negative effects of institutional distance on subsidiary performance are lesser for subsidiaries with partial ownership (than for subsidiaries with full ownership) and for subsidiaries with greater host-country experience. We discuss our findings with respect to Gaur and Lu’s model, which explores the relationships between these variables in a general context.

KW - Emerging markets

KW - Institutional distance

KW - Subsidiary performance

KW - Multinational enterprises

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/11575

U2 - 10.1007/s11575-016-0301-z

DO - 10.1007/s11575-016-0301-z

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 179

EP - 207

JO - Management International Review

JF - Management International Review

SN - 0938-8249

IS - 2

ER -