Abstract
Research about dying is viewed as inherently sensitive because of how death is perceived in many societies. Such framing assumes participants are ‘vulnerable’ and at risk of ‘harm’ from research. Simultaneously, with increasing recognition of the importance of reflexivity, researchers can become (deeply) preoccupied with their actions and experiences in the field. Whilst reflexivity is often described as a helpful process, in this paper we consider when introspection becomes problematic and even harmful for death researchers, in both a professional and personal sense. Identifying a process we call ‘internalising sensitivity’ the paper describes our own experiences of working and living with the pervasive ethical notions of sensitivity, vulnerability, risk and harm. We argue that these discourses can get ‘under the skin’ of researchers in that they impact researchers intellectually, emotionally, and physically, and this in turns affects their relationship with the research process and their place within, and beyond it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 589-602 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 7 Dec 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Internalising ‘sensitivity’: vulnerability, reflexivity and death research(ers)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver