Abstract
speaker recognition systems, the use of reference populations, and awareness of cognitive bias. Developmental trends in this area of forensic speech science are established by comparing responses to the present survey with those to the authors’ earlier survey published in 2011.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 27 Jun 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Jun 2019 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
International Practices in Forensic Speaker Comparisons : Second Survey. / Gold, Erica; French, Peter.
In: International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 26, No. 1, 27.06.2019, p. 1-20.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - International Practices in Forensic Speaker Comparisons
T2 - Second Survey
AU - Gold, Erica
AU - French, Peter
PY - 2019/6/27
Y1 - 2019/6/27
N2 - A survey relating to current practices in forensic speaker comparison testing was recently undertaken of 39 laboratories and individual practitioners across 23 countries. Questions were organised around a number of themes, including the preliminary assessment and preparation of case materials, the checking of analysts’ work, frameworks used for the expression of conclusions, the use of automaticspeaker recognition systems, the use of reference populations, and awareness of cognitive bias. Developmental trends in this area of forensic speech science are established by comparing responses to the present survey with those to the authors’ earlier survey published in 2011.
AB - A survey relating to current practices in forensic speaker comparison testing was recently undertaken of 39 laboratories and individual practitioners across 23 countries. Questions were organised around a number of themes, including the preliminary assessment and preparation of case materials, the checking of analysts’ work, frameworks used for the expression of conclusions, the use of automaticspeaker recognition systems, the use of reference populations, and awareness of cognitive bias. Developmental trends in this area of forensic speech science are established by comparing responses to the present survey with those to the authors’ earlier survey published in 2011.
KW - Forensic Speaker Comparison
KW - Methods
KW - Practices
KW - Preparation
KW - Automatic Speaker Recognition (ASR) Systems
KW - Conclusion Frameworks
KW - cognitive bias
KW - reference populations
KW - Developmental trends
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075133545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1558/ijsll.38028
DO - 10.1558/ijsll.38028
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
JF - International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
SN - 1748-8885
IS - 1
ER -