International Regulation of Armed Conflicts: 'Jus in Bello' in an Age of Increasingly Asymmetric and Hybrid Warfare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The changing character of warfare, exemplified by the increasingly asymmetric and hybrid character of modern armed conflicts, presents complex challenges for the international legal framework regulating armed conflicts - Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. The key factor driving this change has been the growing involvement of non-State actors (combatants, insurgents, militants and terrorist groups) in armed conflicts. While acknowledging the normative progress made in articulating the principles of ‘jus in bello’, the paper highlights persistent and pervasive problems in the application of the law governing armed conflicts to battlefield situations. The article’s key objective is to counsel the necessity for the further refinement and granulation of current ‘signature policies’ involving the use of armed drones in targeting terror suspects. This task is undertaken with a view to attaining a greater degree of accuracy, clarity and precision in calibrating the vital distinction between civilian status and the various categories of presumed combatants. The paper posits the impossibility of attaining the rule of distinction in the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). It further argues that when viewed from this perspective, the mere possession and stockpiling of WMDS could per se be construed as constituting the requisite mens rea, or animus belligerendi, of preparation for the possible future commission of war crimes. The concluding part of the paper outlines a possible conceptual framework for establishing war crimes culpability in the context of nuclear warfare.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalGSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Volume7
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

warfare
regulation
war crime
weapon of mass destruction
legal usage
possession
terrorism
Group

Cite this

@article{b17a25e51203426a97c14ef779f33d8e,
title = "International Regulation of Armed Conflicts: 'Jus in Bello' in an Age of Increasingly Asymmetric and Hybrid Warfare",
abstract = "The changing character of warfare, exemplified by the increasingly asymmetric and hybrid character of modern armed conflicts, presents complex challenges for the international legal framework regulating armed conflicts - Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. The key factor driving this change has been the growing involvement of non-State actors (combatants, insurgents, militants and terrorist groups) in armed conflicts. While acknowledging the normative progress made in articulating the principles of ‘jus in bello’, the paper highlights persistent and pervasive problems in the application of the law governing armed conflicts to battlefield situations. The article’s key objective is to counsel the necessity for the further refinement and granulation of current ‘signature policies’ involving the use of armed drones in targeting terror suspects. This task is undertaken with a view to attaining a greater degree of accuracy, clarity and precision in calibrating the vital distinction between civilian status and the various categories of presumed combatants. The paper posits the impossibility of attaining the rule of distinction in the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). It further argues that when viewed from this perspective, the mere possession and stockpiling of WMDS could per se be construed as constituting the requisite mens rea, or animus belligerendi, of preparation for the possible future commission of war crimes. The concluding part of the paper outlines a possible conceptual framework for establishing war crimes culpability in the context of nuclear warfare.",
keywords = "International law, Law of armed conflict, Asymmetric and hybrid warfare, international humanitarian law, War crimes",
author = "George Ndi",
note = "This journal article is an extended version of a prize winning paper presented at the Singapore Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy (LRPP) in June 2017.",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "29",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences",
issn = "2251-2853",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Regulation of Armed Conflicts

T2 - GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences

AU - Ndi, George

N1 - This journal article is an extended version of a prize winning paper presented at the Singapore Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy (LRPP) in June 2017.

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - The changing character of warfare, exemplified by the increasingly asymmetric and hybrid character of modern armed conflicts, presents complex challenges for the international legal framework regulating armed conflicts - Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. The key factor driving this change has been the growing involvement of non-State actors (combatants, insurgents, militants and terrorist groups) in armed conflicts. While acknowledging the normative progress made in articulating the principles of ‘jus in bello’, the paper highlights persistent and pervasive problems in the application of the law governing armed conflicts to battlefield situations. The article’s key objective is to counsel the necessity for the further refinement and granulation of current ‘signature policies’ involving the use of armed drones in targeting terror suspects. This task is undertaken with a view to attaining a greater degree of accuracy, clarity and precision in calibrating the vital distinction between civilian status and the various categories of presumed combatants. The paper posits the impossibility of attaining the rule of distinction in the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). It further argues that when viewed from this perspective, the mere possession and stockpiling of WMDS could per se be construed as constituting the requisite mens rea, or animus belligerendi, of preparation for the possible future commission of war crimes. The concluding part of the paper outlines a possible conceptual framework for establishing war crimes culpability in the context of nuclear warfare.

AB - The changing character of warfare, exemplified by the increasingly asymmetric and hybrid character of modern armed conflicts, presents complex challenges for the international legal framework regulating armed conflicts - Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. The key factor driving this change has been the growing involvement of non-State actors (combatants, insurgents, militants and terrorist groups) in armed conflicts. While acknowledging the normative progress made in articulating the principles of ‘jus in bello’, the paper highlights persistent and pervasive problems in the application of the law governing armed conflicts to battlefield situations. The article’s key objective is to counsel the necessity for the further refinement and granulation of current ‘signature policies’ involving the use of armed drones in targeting terror suspects. This task is undertaken with a view to attaining a greater degree of accuracy, clarity and precision in calibrating the vital distinction between civilian status and the various categories of presumed combatants. The paper posits the impossibility of attaining the rule of distinction in the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). It further argues that when viewed from this perspective, the mere possession and stockpiling of WMDS could per se be construed as constituting the requisite mens rea, or animus belligerendi, of preparation for the possible future commission of war crimes. The concluding part of the paper outlines a possible conceptual framework for establishing war crimes culpability in the context of nuclear warfare.

KW - International law

KW - Law of armed conflict

KW - Asymmetric and hybrid warfare

KW - international humanitarian law

KW - War crimes

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences

JF - GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences

SN - 2251-2853

IS - 1

ER -