Interpreting Metadata and Ontologies of Virtual Heritage Artefacts

Danilo Di Mascio, Pieter Pauwels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many cultural heritage artefacts are digitised, resulting in a considerable number of virtual heritage artefacts, including 3D models, textual database records, images, point clouds, videos and so forth. These virtual heritage artefacts are often, if not always, accompanied by metadata standards and commonly agreed upon ontologies. These metadata and ontologies allow to build representations of virtual heritage artefacts that can be shared afterwards across different environments. In other words, the information about the artefact is interoperable. In many cases, however, it appears to be not so straightforward to use the artefact information in a context different from what it was initially meant for. This situation is analysed here, indicating that the interpretation of artefacts, both virtual and real, depends not only on the observed entities (virtual and real artefacts), but also on the background knowledge of the interpreter (personal), which can only remotely be captured in metadata and ontologies (cfr. user profiles). From the analysis results, recommendations are proposed about the pragmatic usage of metadata and ontologies in the context of virtual heritage artefacts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-555
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

metadata
artifact
cultural heritage

Cite this

@article{25cc12db17704136aa38665fcc90349b,
title = "Interpreting Metadata and Ontologies of Virtual Heritage Artefacts",
abstract = "Many cultural heritage artefacts are digitised, resulting in a considerable number of virtual heritage artefacts, including 3D models, textual database records, images, point clouds, videos and so forth. These virtual heritage artefacts are often, if not always, accompanied by metadata standards and commonly agreed upon ontologies. These metadata and ontologies allow to build representations of virtual heritage artefacts that can be shared afterwards across different environments. In other words, the information about the artefact is interoperable. In many cases, however, it appears to be not so straightforward to use the artefact information in a context different from what it was initially meant for. This situation is analysed here, indicating that the interpretation of artefacts, both virtual and real, depends not only on the observed entities (virtual and real artefacts), but also on the background knowledge of the interpreter (personal), which can only remotely be captured in metadata and ontologies (cfr. user profiles). From the analysis results, recommendations are proposed about the pragmatic usage of metadata and ontologies in the context of virtual heritage artefacts.",
author = "{Di Mascio}, Danilo and Pieter Pauwels",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1260/2047-4970.3.3.531",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "531--555",
journal = "International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era",
issn = "2047-4970",
publisher = "Multi-Science Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Interpreting Metadata and Ontologies of Virtual Heritage Artefacts. / Di Mascio, Danilo; Pauwels, Pieter.

In: International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 531-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting Metadata and Ontologies of Virtual Heritage Artefacts

AU - Di Mascio, Danilo

AU - Pauwels, Pieter

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Many cultural heritage artefacts are digitised, resulting in a considerable number of virtual heritage artefacts, including 3D models, textual database records, images, point clouds, videos and so forth. These virtual heritage artefacts are often, if not always, accompanied by metadata standards and commonly agreed upon ontologies. These metadata and ontologies allow to build representations of virtual heritage artefacts that can be shared afterwards across different environments. In other words, the information about the artefact is interoperable. In many cases, however, it appears to be not so straightforward to use the artefact information in a context different from what it was initially meant for. This situation is analysed here, indicating that the interpretation of artefacts, both virtual and real, depends not only on the observed entities (virtual and real artefacts), but also on the background knowledge of the interpreter (personal), which can only remotely be captured in metadata and ontologies (cfr. user profiles). From the analysis results, recommendations are proposed about the pragmatic usage of metadata and ontologies in the context of virtual heritage artefacts.

AB - Many cultural heritage artefacts are digitised, resulting in a considerable number of virtual heritage artefacts, including 3D models, textual database records, images, point clouds, videos and so forth. These virtual heritage artefacts are often, if not always, accompanied by metadata standards and commonly agreed upon ontologies. These metadata and ontologies allow to build representations of virtual heritage artefacts that can be shared afterwards across different environments. In other words, the information about the artefact is interoperable. In many cases, however, it appears to be not so straightforward to use the artefact information in a context different from what it was initially meant for. This situation is analysed here, indicating that the interpretation of artefacts, both virtual and real, depends not only on the observed entities (virtual and real artefacts), but also on the background knowledge of the interpreter (personal), which can only remotely be captured in metadata and ontologies (cfr. user profiles). From the analysis results, recommendations are proposed about the pragmatic usage of metadata and ontologies in the context of virtual heritage artefacts.

U2 - 10.1260/2047-4970.3.3.531

DO - 10.1260/2047-4970.3.3.531

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 531

EP - 555

JO - International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era

JF - International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era

SN - 2047-4970

IS - 3

ER -