Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: Impact of the Gold Standards Framework

Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf, Daniel Munday, Nigel King, Jeremy Dale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim: To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. Design of study: Qualitative interview case study. Setting: Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method: Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results: Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues, informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical, working style. Conclusion: Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-263
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume58
Issue number549
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

    Fingerprint

Cite this