Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care

Impact of the Gold Standards Framework

Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf, Daniel Munday, Nigel King, Jeremy Dale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim: To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. Design of study: Qualitative interview case study. Setting: Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method: Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results: Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues, informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical, working style. Conclusion: Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-263
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume58
Issue number549
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Primary Health Care
Nurses
Communication
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Knowledge Management
Terminal Care
Quality of Health Care
General Practice
England
Quality of Life

Cite this

@article{090c0f2b3f344726909f8f466df83f79,
title = "Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: Impact of the Gold Standards Framework",
abstract = "Background: High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim: To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. Design of study: Qualitative interview case study. Setting: Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method: Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results: Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues, informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical, working style. Conclusion: Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.",
keywords = "Communication, Interdisciplinary health care team, Interprofessional relationships, Palliative care, Primary care",
author = "Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf and Daniel Munday and Nigel King and Jeremy Dale",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp08X279760",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "256--263",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "549",

}

Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care : Impact of the Gold Standards Framework. / Mahmood-Yousuf, Kashifa; Munday, Daniel; King, Nigel; Dale, Jeremy.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 58, No. 549, 04.2008, p. 256-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care

T2 - Impact of the Gold Standards Framework

AU - Mahmood-Yousuf, Kashifa

AU - Munday, Daniel

AU - King, Nigel

AU - Dale, Jeremy

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Background: High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim: To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. Design of study: Qualitative interview case study. Setting: Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method: Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results: Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues, informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical, working style. Conclusion: Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.

AB - Background: High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim: To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. Design of study: Qualitative interview case study. Setting: Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method: Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results: Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues, informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical, working style. Conclusion: Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.

KW - Communication

KW - Interdisciplinary health care team

KW - Interprofessional relationships

KW - Palliative care

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42049098381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp08X279760

DO - 10.3399/bjgp08X279760

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 256

EP - 263

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 549

ER -