Introduction and Validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An Empirical Investigation of the Story Model

Dominic Willmott, Daniel Boduszek, Agata Debowska, Russell Woodfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within criminal trials, based on theoretical features set out in the Story Model of juror decision making.
Methods: The Juror Decision Scale (JDS) and Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) measure were completed by 324 jury-eligible participants split across 27 jury panels, after observing a rape trial re-enactment high in ecological validity. Dimensionality and construct validity of the JDS was investigated using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques alongside confirmatory bifactor analysis at two time points (individual juror verdict decisions pre- and post-deliberation). Three competing models of the JDS were specified and tested using Mplus with maximum likelihood robust estimation.
Results: Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (complainant believability, defendant believability, decision confidence) was the best fit for the data at both decision points. Good composite reliability and differential predictive validity were observed for the three JDS subscales.
Conclusion: Alongside demonstrating its multidimensional conceptualisation, the JDS development permits future empirical testing of the Story Model theoretical assertions surrounding juror decision making. Present findings also provide early evidence of a certainty principle assessment process governing individual verdict decision formation. Theoretical and practical applications are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages26-34
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume57
Early online date4 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Aggression
Self Report
Statistical Factor Analysis
Theoretical Models
decision making
deliberation
construct validity
rape
aggression
factor analysis
myth
acceptance
confidence
evidence

Cite this

@article{f8ec2dbf9074467ba2a77fcadba20208,
title = "Introduction and Validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An Empirical Investigation of the Story Model",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within criminal trials, based on theoretical features set out in the Story Model of juror decision making. Methods: The Juror Decision Scale (JDS) and Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) measure were completed by 324 jury-eligible participants split across 27 jury panels, after observing a rape trial re-enactment high in ecological validity. Dimensionality and construct validity of the JDS was investigated using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques alongside confirmatory bifactor analysis at two time points (individual juror verdict decisions pre- and post-deliberation). Three competing models of the JDS were specified and tested using Mplus with maximum likelihood robust estimation. Results: Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (complainant believability, defendant believability, decision confidence) was the best fit for the data at both decision points. Good composite reliability and differential predictive validity were observed for the three JDS subscales.Conclusion: Alongside demonstrating its multidimensional conceptualisation, the JDS development permits future empirical testing of the Story Model theoretical assertions surrounding juror decision making. Present findings also provide early evidence of a certainty principle assessment process governing individual verdict decision formation. Theoretical and practical applications are discussed.",
keywords = "certainty principles, confirmatory factor analysis, differential predictive validity, jury decision making, Juror Decision Scale (JDS), story model, Story Model, Confirmatory factor analysis, Jury decision making, Differential predictive validity, Certainty principles",
author = "Dominic Willmott and Daniel Boduszek and Agata Debowska and Russell Woodfield",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "26--34",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Introduction and Validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS) : An Empirical Investigation of the Story Model. / Willmott, Dominic; Boduszek, Daniel; Debowska, Agata; Woodfield, Russell.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 57, 07.2018, p. 26-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction and Validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS)

T2 - Journal of Criminal Justice

AU - Willmott, Dominic

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Debowska, Agata

AU - Woodfield, Russell

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within criminal trials, based on theoretical features set out in the Story Model of juror decision making. Methods: The Juror Decision Scale (JDS) and Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) measure were completed by 324 jury-eligible participants split across 27 jury panels, after observing a rape trial re-enactment high in ecological validity. Dimensionality and construct validity of the JDS was investigated using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques alongside confirmatory bifactor analysis at two time points (individual juror verdict decisions pre- and post-deliberation). Three competing models of the JDS were specified and tested using Mplus with maximum likelihood robust estimation. Results: Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (complainant believability, defendant believability, decision confidence) was the best fit for the data at both decision points. Good composite reliability and differential predictive validity were observed for the three JDS subscales.Conclusion: Alongside demonstrating its multidimensional conceptualisation, the JDS development permits future empirical testing of the Story Model theoretical assertions surrounding juror decision making. Present findings also provide early evidence of a certainty principle assessment process governing individual verdict decision formation. Theoretical and practical applications are discussed.

AB - Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within criminal trials, based on theoretical features set out in the Story Model of juror decision making. Methods: The Juror Decision Scale (JDS) and Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) measure were completed by 324 jury-eligible participants split across 27 jury panels, after observing a rape trial re-enactment high in ecological validity. Dimensionality and construct validity of the JDS was investigated using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques alongside confirmatory bifactor analysis at two time points (individual juror verdict decisions pre- and post-deliberation). Three competing models of the JDS were specified and tested using Mplus with maximum likelihood robust estimation. Results: Bifactor model with three meaningful factors (complainant believability, defendant believability, decision confidence) was the best fit for the data at both decision points. Good composite reliability and differential predictive validity were observed for the three JDS subscales.Conclusion: Alongside demonstrating its multidimensional conceptualisation, the JDS development permits future empirical testing of the Story Model theoretical assertions surrounding juror decision making. Present findings also provide early evidence of a certainty principle assessment process governing individual verdict decision formation. Theoretical and practical applications are discussed.

KW - certainty principles

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - differential predictive validity

KW - jury decision making

KW - Juror Decision Scale (JDS)

KW - story model

KW - Story Model

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Jury decision making

KW - Differential predictive validity

KW - Certainty principles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054035295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 26

EP - 34

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

ER -