Abstract
We attempted to cross-validate the Classification of Violence Risk, or COVR (Monahan, Steadman, Appelbaum et al., 2005), in a sample of acute psychiatric patients in the North West of England. The study used a prospective design to follow-up 93 patients assessed using the COVR for 20 weeks post-discharge. Overall, the COVR did not demonstrate significant predictive validity with respect to violence. More than half of patients classified as average risk by the COVR were violent in the follow-up compared to less than 20% of those in the very low risk group, but none of the high-risk participants were violent. In contrast, violence was significantly predicted by key variables, including female gender, violence preceding admission, and personality disorder. There is a need for more cross-validation research of the COVR.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 316-323 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Forensic Mental Health |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 9 Dec 2010 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Dec 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the Validity of the Classification of Violence Risk in a UK Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver