Investigative Decision Making: Interviews with Detectives

Elpiniki Spanoudaki, Maria Ioannou, John Synnott, Kalliopi Tzani Pepelasi, Ntaniella Pylarinou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore investigative decision-making processes in the context of major crimes as experienced by the law enforcement agents. Design/methodology/approach: Episodic interviews were conducted with six agents from medium-sized police forces in the UK. Following the framework of naturalistic inquiry, qualitative content analysis took place with the assistance of Atlas.ti software. To ensure the validity of findings, the within method triangulation was preferred, by additionally analysing the interview transcripts with Alceste. Findings: Findings from this study revealed a variety of internal factors at play, shaping the decision-making course into an act of balancing various desired goals. Detectives appear to assess a situation based on their experiences confirming that the naturalistic decision-making model may assist in understanding investigative decision-making. Research limitations/implications: Due to the busy schedule of law enforcement agents the number of participants was limited and availability difficult; therefore, this study can be thought of as a pilot study that will inspire researchers to use the same method for in-depth understanding of investigative decision-making. Practical implications: Results captured the ill-defined goals in the police environment and provided ways of decreasing their impact on investigative decision-making thus should help detectives to understand their decision-making limitations and strengths. Social implications: This project will enhance the psychological understanding of investigative decision-making. Originality/value: This project assists in understanding the psychological aspect of investigative decision-making during police duty and provides the opportunity to law enforcement agents to re-evaluate situations in order to improve the investigative decision-making process; while adds to existing literature.

LanguageEnglish
Pages88-107
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Criminal Psychology
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Interviews
decision making
interview
Law Enforcement
law enforcement
Police
police
decision-making process
Psychology
triangulation
Atlases
Crime
content analysis
assistance
offense
Appointments and Schedules
Software
Research Personnel
methodology

Cite this

@article{abb6d3602e3f485f9713bf949d60cc6b,
title = "Investigative Decision Making: Interviews with Detectives",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore investigative decision-making processes in the context of major crimes as experienced by the law enforcement agents. Design/methodology/approach: Episodic interviews were conducted with six agents from medium-sized police forces in the UK. Following the framework of naturalistic inquiry, qualitative content analysis took place with the assistance of Atlas.ti software. To ensure the validity of findings, the within method triangulation was preferred, by additionally analysing the interview transcripts with Alceste. Findings: Findings from this study revealed a variety of internal factors at play, shaping the decision-making course into an act of balancing various desired goals. Detectives appear to assess a situation based on their experiences confirming that the naturalistic decision-making model may assist in understanding investigative decision-making. Research limitations/implications: Due to the busy schedule of law enforcement agents the number of participants was limited and availability difficult; therefore, this study can be thought of as a pilot study that will inspire researchers to use the same method for in-depth understanding of investigative decision-making. Practical implications: Results captured the ill-defined goals in the police environment and provided ways of decreasing their impact on investigative decision-making thus should help detectives to understand their decision-making limitations and strengths. Social implications: This project will enhance the psychological understanding of investigative decision-making. Originality/value: This project assists in understanding the psychological aspect of investigative decision-making during police duty and provides the opportunity to law enforcement agents to re-evaluate situations in order to improve the investigative decision-making process; while adds to existing literature.",
keywords = "Police investigations, Investigative decision-making, Naturalistic Decision-making model, Psychological understanding, Police duty, Police environment, Naturalistic decision-making model",
author = "Elpiniki Spanoudaki and Maria Ioannou and John Synnott and {Tzani Pepelasi}, Kalliopi and Ntaniella Pylarinou",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/JCP-02-2018-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "88--107",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Psychology",
issn = "2009-3829",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Investigative Decision Making : Interviews with Detectives. / Spanoudaki, Elpiniki ; Ioannou, Maria; Synnott, John; Tzani Pepelasi, Kalliopi; Pylarinou, Ntaniella.

In: Journal of Criminal Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 25.04.2019, p. 88-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigative Decision Making

T2 - Journal of Criminal Psychology

AU - Spanoudaki, Elpiniki

AU - Ioannou, Maria

AU - Synnott, John

AU - Tzani Pepelasi, Kalliopi

AU - Pylarinou, Ntaniella

PY - 2019/4/25

Y1 - 2019/4/25

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore investigative decision-making processes in the context of major crimes as experienced by the law enforcement agents. Design/methodology/approach: Episodic interviews were conducted with six agents from medium-sized police forces in the UK. Following the framework of naturalistic inquiry, qualitative content analysis took place with the assistance of Atlas.ti software. To ensure the validity of findings, the within method triangulation was preferred, by additionally analysing the interview transcripts with Alceste. Findings: Findings from this study revealed a variety of internal factors at play, shaping the decision-making course into an act of balancing various desired goals. Detectives appear to assess a situation based on their experiences confirming that the naturalistic decision-making model may assist in understanding investigative decision-making. Research limitations/implications: Due to the busy schedule of law enforcement agents the number of participants was limited and availability difficult; therefore, this study can be thought of as a pilot study that will inspire researchers to use the same method for in-depth understanding of investigative decision-making. Practical implications: Results captured the ill-defined goals in the police environment and provided ways of decreasing their impact on investigative decision-making thus should help detectives to understand their decision-making limitations and strengths. Social implications: This project will enhance the psychological understanding of investigative decision-making. Originality/value: This project assists in understanding the psychological aspect of investigative decision-making during police duty and provides the opportunity to law enforcement agents to re-evaluate situations in order to improve the investigative decision-making process; while adds to existing literature.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore investigative decision-making processes in the context of major crimes as experienced by the law enforcement agents. Design/methodology/approach: Episodic interviews were conducted with six agents from medium-sized police forces in the UK. Following the framework of naturalistic inquiry, qualitative content analysis took place with the assistance of Atlas.ti software. To ensure the validity of findings, the within method triangulation was preferred, by additionally analysing the interview transcripts with Alceste. Findings: Findings from this study revealed a variety of internal factors at play, shaping the decision-making course into an act of balancing various desired goals. Detectives appear to assess a situation based on their experiences confirming that the naturalistic decision-making model may assist in understanding investigative decision-making. Research limitations/implications: Due to the busy schedule of law enforcement agents the number of participants was limited and availability difficult; therefore, this study can be thought of as a pilot study that will inspire researchers to use the same method for in-depth understanding of investigative decision-making. Practical implications: Results captured the ill-defined goals in the police environment and provided ways of decreasing their impact on investigative decision-making thus should help detectives to understand their decision-making limitations and strengths. Social implications: This project will enhance the psychological understanding of investigative decision-making. Originality/value: This project assists in understanding the psychological aspect of investigative decision-making during police duty and provides the opportunity to law enforcement agents to re-evaluate situations in order to improve the investigative decision-making process; while adds to existing literature.

KW - Police investigations

KW - Investigative decision-making

KW - Naturalistic Decision-making model

KW - Psychological understanding

KW - Police duty

KW - Police environment

KW - Naturalistic decision-making model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065030208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JCP-02-2018-0005

DO - 10.1108/JCP-02-2018-0005

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 88

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Criminal Psychology

JF - Journal of Criminal Psychology

SN - 2009-3829

IS - 2

ER -