TY - JOUR
T1 - Is bias biased?
AU - Ousey, Karen
AU - Totty, Joshua
AU - Pagnamenta, Fania
AU - Moore, Zena
AU - Williams, Kate
N1 - Funding Information:
Most large-scale studies generally declare this stating clearly if this was a government funded grant, an unrestricted educational grant, funding for a scholarship (e.g., Doctoral funding) or commercial funding, and this can also lead to a form of reader bias.
PY - 2022/3/18
Y1 - 2022/3/18
N2 - Bias is defined as any tendency which prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question (Dictionary.com). Bias can occur at any phase of research, including study design, data collection, data analysis and publication thereby impacting on the validity and reliability of study findings. It is often difficult for the reader of a paper to fully understand if bias is or is not present, arguably there is always an element of bias in any study, readers must consider how bias might influence a study's conclusions (Gerhard, 2008). Critical appraisal of all studies will assist the reader in understanding risk of bias through for example, evaluating the strength of internal and external validity, and consideration of how the sample was selected, the study design, if the sample size was adequate, choice of outcome measures, how randomisation was achieved (if appropriate), if the study was blinded, attrition and publication bias. All publications should, as a course of best practice, state their source of funding.
AB - Bias is defined as any tendency which prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question (Dictionary.com). Bias can occur at any phase of research, including study design, data collection, data analysis and publication thereby impacting on the validity and reliability of study findings. It is often difficult for the reader of a paper to fully understand if bias is or is not present, arguably there is always an element of bias in any study, readers must consider how bias might influence a study's conclusions (Gerhard, 2008). Critical appraisal of all studies will assist the reader in understanding risk of bias through for example, evaluating the strength of internal and external validity, and consideration of how the sample was selected, the study design, if the sample size was adequate, choice of outcome measures, how randomisation was achieved (if appropriate), if the study was blinded, attrition and publication bias. All publications should, as a course of best practice, state their source of funding.
KW - bias
KW - risk of bias
KW - critical appraisal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127334841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85127334841
VL - 18
SP - 16
EP - 21
JO - Wounds UK
JF - Wounds UK
SN - 1746-6814
IS - 1
ER -