Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation?

Lauri Koskela, Ruben Vrijhoef

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An explanation for the low innovation activity in construction is put forward. The central argument is that the current theory of construction is one root cause for low innovation activity. Instead, an explicit and more powerful theory of construction is needed for further innovation, which is 'to manage new ideas into good currency'. There are three main mechanisms in the current theory of construction which are identified as causing this hindrance. Firstly, production theories in general, as well as construction theories specifically, have been implicity. Therefore, it has not been possible to transfer radical managerial innovations, such as lean production, from manufacturing to construction at a theoretical level. Direct application of this production template to construction has been limited due to the different context of construction in comparison with manufacturing. Secondly, the current theoretical model of construction is based on the transformation model of production. It is argued that the principles of this model are counterproductive, because uncertainty and interdependence are abstracted away. This leads to fragmented and myopic management and inflated variability. Practical examples show that these deficiencies and related practical constraints hinder the implementation of top-down innovations. Thirdly, empirical research shows that also bottom-up innovations - systematic learning and problem solving - are being hindered by the current theory. Thus, the advancement of innovations in construction requires that a new, explicit and valid theory of construction is created, and business models and control methods are developed on the basis of that new theory.

LanguageEnglish
Pages197-207
Number of pages11
Volume29
No.3
Specialist publicationBuilding Research and Information
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Innovation

Cite this

@misc{ff127d4cf99a446cab0fa4322fcf9e1a,
title = "Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation?",
abstract = "An explanation for the low innovation activity in construction is put forward. The central argument is that the current theory of construction is one root cause for low innovation activity. Instead, an explicit and more powerful theory of construction is needed for further innovation, which is 'to manage new ideas into good currency'. There are three main mechanisms in the current theory of construction which are identified as causing this hindrance. Firstly, production theories in general, as well as construction theories specifically, have been implicity. Therefore, it has not been possible to transfer radical managerial innovations, such as lean production, from manufacturing to construction at a theoretical level. Direct application of this production template to construction has been limited due to the different context of construction in comparison with manufacturing. Secondly, the current theoretical model of construction is based on the transformation model of production. It is argued that the principles of this model are counterproductive, because uncertainty and interdependence are abstracted away. This leads to fragmented and myopic management and inflated variability. Practical examples show that these deficiencies and related practical constraints hinder the implementation of top-down innovations. Thirdly, empirical research shows that also bottom-up innovations - systematic learning and problem solving - are being hindered by the current theory. Thus, the advancement of innovations in construction requires that a new, explicit and valid theory of construction is created, and business models and control methods are developed on the basis of that new theory.",
keywords = "Diffusion of manufacturing templates, Innovation, Innovation theory, Management, Production theory",
author = "Lauri Koskela and Ruben Vrijhoef",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09613210110039266",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "197--207",
journal = "Building Research and Information",
issn = "0961-3218",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? / Koskela, Lauri; Vrijhoef, Ruben.

In: Building Research and Information, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.05.2001, p. 197-207.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation?

AU - Koskela, Lauri

AU - Vrijhoef, Ruben

PY - 2001/5/1

Y1 - 2001/5/1

N2 - An explanation for the low innovation activity in construction is put forward. The central argument is that the current theory of construction is one root cause for low innovation activity. Instead, an explicit and more powerful theory of construction is needed for further innovation, which is 'to manage new ideas into good currency'. There are three main mechanisms in the current theory of construction which are identified as causing this hindrance. Firstly, production theories in general, as well as construction theories specifically, have been implicity. Therefore, it has not been possible to transfer radical managerial innovations, such as lean production, from manufacturing to construction at a theoretical level. Direct application of this production template to construction has been limited due to the different context of construction in comparison with manufacturing. Secondly, the current theoretical model of construction is based on the transformation model of production. It is argued that the principles of this model are counterproductive, because uncertainty and interdependence are abstracted away. This leads to fragmented and myopic management and inflated variability. Practical examples show that these deficiencies and related practical constraints hinder the implementation of top-down innovations. Thirdly, empirical research shows that also bottom-up innovations - systematic learning and problem solving - are being hindered by the current theory. Thus, the advancement of innovations in construction requires that a new, explicit and valid theory of construction is created, and business models and control methods are developed on the basis of that new theory.

AB - An explanation for the low innovation activity in construction is put forward. The central argument is that the current theory of construction is one root cause for low innovation activity. Instead, an explicit and more powerful theory of construction is needed for further innovation, which is 'to manage new ideas into good currency'. There are three main mechanisms in the current theory of construction which are identified as causing this hindrance. Firstly, production theories in general, as well as construction theories specifically, have been implicity. Therefore, it has not been possible to transfer radical managerial innovations, such as lean production, from manufacturing to construction at a theoretical level. Direct application of this production template to construction has been limited due to the different context of construction in comparison with manufacturing. Secondly, the current theoretical model of construction is based on the transformation model of production. It is argued that the principles of this model are counterproductive, because uncertainty and interdependence are abstracted away. This leads to fragmented and myopic management and inflated variability. Practical examples show that these deficiencies and related practical constraints hinder the implementation of top-down innovations. Thirdly, empirical research shows that also bottom-up innovations - systematic learning and problem solving - are being hindered by the current theory. Thus, the advancement of innovations in construction requires that a new, explicit and valid theory of construction is created, and business models and control methods are developed on the basis of that new theory.

KW - Diffusion of manufacturing templates

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovation theory

KW - Management

KW - Production theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035339072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09613210110039266

DO - 10.1080/09613210110039266

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 197

EP - 207

JO - Building Research and Information

T2 - Building Research and Information

JF - Building Research and Information

SN - 0961-3218

ER -