Issues and opportunities: The application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison

Erica Gold, Vincent Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Across forensic speech science, the likelihood ratio (LR) is increasingly becoming accepted as the logically and legally correct framework for the expression of expert conclusions. However, there remain a number of theoretical and practical shortcomings in the procedures applied for computing LRs based on speech evidence. In this paper we review how the LR is currently applied to speaker comparison evidence and outline three specific areas which deserve further investigation: namely statistical modelling, issues relating to the relevant population and the combination of LRs from correlated parameters. We then consider future directions for confronting these issues and discuss the implications for forensic comparison evidence more generally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-299
Number of pages8
JournalScience and Justice
Volume54
Issue number4
Early online date10 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Issues and opportunities: The application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this