Judging gender from samples of adult handwriting: Accuracy and use of cues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2 experiments, participants judged 2 samples of adult handwriting for gender of writer; their accuracy was significantly better than chance and improved with practice. In a 3rd experiment, participants who were not cued for gender of writer judged coded male and female scripts to be significantly different with respect to features such as carefulness, neatness, regularity, and apparent speed of execution. The participants cued for gender of writer on the basis of their judgments on stylistic features such as slope and roundness, which appeared to be subsumed within the “higher order” dimensions of carefulness versus confidence. The results suggest that the participants cued for gender of writer may have been influenced by gender stereotypes, leading to errors in some of their judgments.

LanguageEnglish
Pages691-700
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume142
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Handwriting
Cues

Cite this

@article{8b0e87d20b034baa8a264a41e266615e,
title = "Judging gender from samples of adult handwriting: Accuracy and use of cues",
abstract = "In 2 experiments, participants judged 2 samples of adult handwriting for gender of writer; their accuracy was significantly better than chance and improved with practice. In a 3rd experiment, participants who were not cued for gender of writer judged coded male and female scripts to be significantly different with respect to features such as carefulness, neatness, regularity, and apparent speed of execution. The participants cued for gender of writer on the basis of their judgments on stylistic features such as slope and roundness, which appeared to be subsumed within the “higher order” dimensions of carefulness versus confidence. The results suggest that the participants cued for gender of writer may have been influenced by gender stereotypes, leading to errors in some of their judgments.",
keywords = "Gender, Judgment of handwriting, Stereotypes",
author = "Vivien Burr",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224540209603929",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "691--700",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Judging gender from samples of adult handwriting : Accuracy and use of cues. / Burr, Vivien.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 142, No. 6, 01.12.2002, p. 691-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging gender from samples of adult handwriting

T2 - Journal of Social Psychology

AU - Burr, Vivien

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - In 2 experiments, participants judged 2 samples of adult handwriting for gender of writer; their accuracy was significantly better than chance and improved with practice. In a 3rd experiment, participants who were not cued for gender of writer judged coded male and female scripts to be significantly different with respect to features such as carefulness, neatness, regularity, and apparent speed of execution. The participants cued for gender of writer on the basis of their judgments on stylistic features such as slope and roundness, which appeared to be subsumed within the “higher order” dimensions of carefulness versus confidence. The results suggest that the participants cued for gender of writer may have been influenced by gender stereotypes, leading to errors in some of their judgments.

AB - In 2 experiments, participants judged 2 samples of adult handwriting for gender of writer; their accuracy was significantly better than chance and improved with practice. In a 3rd experiment, participants who were not cued for gender of writer judged coded male and female scripts to be significantly different with respect to features such as carefulness, neatness, regularity, and apparent speed of execution. The participants cued for gender of writer on the basis of their judgments on stylistic features such as slope and roundness, which appeared to be subsumed within the “higher order” dimensions of carefulness versus confidence. The results suggest that the participants cued for gender of writer may have been influenced by gender stereotypes, leading to errors in some of their judgments.

KW - Gender

KW - Judgment of handwriting

KW - Stereotypes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036885598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224540209603929

DO - 10.1080/00224540209603929

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 691

EP - 700

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 6

ER -