Just Gassing: An Analysis of Direct Reported Speech in a Conversation Between Employees of a Gas Supply Company

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on direct reported speech, investigating its use in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. First, the design of the device is considered, beginning with the observation that it claims to reproduce former utterances, and noting that this underpins a number of other closely related features: that it provides evidence of what was said; that it can be used to portray a series of utterances; that it gives 'access' to them in a seemingly objective fashion; and that prosody can be used to convey how the reported locution was uttered. This leads to a consideration of how the device contributes to the sequence of speech activities embedded within the conversation. Second, the sequential position of the reported speech is considered in terms of the recipient's responses. This further illuminates how features of the device contribute to its role within the ongoing sequence of actions, and consequently the kinds of actions that appropriately follow it. Thus, the contribution of the reported speech in terms of the institutional tasks conducted by the speakers is considered, and the nature of 'institutional' versus 'ordinary' talk. It is suggested that a central use made of the device is to generate affiliation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages505-537
Number of pages33
JournalText
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Gas supply
conversation
employee
Personnel
supply
Industry
recipient
Employees
Direct Reported Speech
Gas
evidence
Utterance
Reported Speech

Cite this

@article{ef46769824814b029cbc65854064e932,
title = "Just Gassing: An Analysis of Direct Reported Speech in a Conversation Between Employees of a Gas Supply Company",
abstract = "This article focuses on direct reported speech, investigating its use in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. First, the design of the device is considered, beginning with the observation that it claims to reproduce former utterances, and noting that this underpins a number of other closely related features: that it provides evidence of what was said; that it can be used to portray a series of utterances; that it gives 'access' to them in a seemingly objective fashion; and that prosody can be used to convey how the reported locution was uttered. This leads to a consideration of how the device contributes to the sequence of speech activities embedded within the conversation. Second, the sequential position of the reported speech is considered in terms of the recipient's responses. This further illuminates how features of the device contribute to its role within the ongoing sequence of actions, and consequently the kinds of actions that appropriately follow it. Thus, the contribution of the reported speech in terms of the institutional tasks conducted by the speakers is considered, and the nature of 'institutional' versus 'ordinary' talk. It is suggested that a central use made of the device is to generate affiliation.",
keywords = "Affiliation, Concurrent Response, Conversation, Direct Reported Speech, Institutional Talk, Recipient's Response",
author = "Elizabeth Holt",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.505",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "505--537",
journal = "Text and Talk",
issn = "1860-7330",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "4",

}

Just Gassing : An Analysis of Direct Reported Speech in a Conversation Between Employees of a Gas Supply Company. / Holt, Elizabeth.

In: Text, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1999, p. 505-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just Gassing

T2 - Text and Talk

AU - Holt, Elizabeth

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This article focuses on direct reported speech, investigating its use in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. First, the design of the device is considered, beginning with the observation that it claims to reproduce former utterances, and noting that this underpins a number of other closely related features: that it provides evidence of what was said; that it can be used to portray a series of utterances; that it gives 'access' to them in a seemingly objective fashion; and that prosody can be used to convey how the reported locution was uttered. This leads to a consideration of how the device contributes to the sequence of speech activities embedded within the conversation. Second, the sequential position of the reported speech is considered in terms of the recipient's responses. This further illuminates how features of the device contribute to its role within the ongoing sequence of actions, and consequently the kinds of actions that appropriately follow it. Thus, the contribution of the reported speech in terms of the institutional tasks conducted by the speakers is considered, and the nature of 'institutional' versus 'ordinary' talk. It is suggested that a central use made of the device is to generate affiliation.

AB - This article focuses on direct reported speech, investigating its use in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. First, the design of the device is considered, beginning with the observation that it claims to reproduce former utterances, and noting that this underpins a number of other closely related features: that it provides evidence of what was said; that it can be used to portray a series of utterances; that it gives 'access' to them in a seemingly objective fashion; and that prosody can be used to convey how the reported locution was uttered. This leads to a consideration of how the device contributes to the sequence of speech activities embedded within the conversation. Second, the sequential position of the reported speech is considered in terms of the recipient's responses. This further illuminates how features of the device contribute to its role within the ongoing sequence of actions, and consequently the kinds of actions that appropriately follow it. Thus, the contribution of the reported speech in terms of the institutional tasks conducted by the speakers is considered, and the nature of 'institutional' versus 'ordinary' talk. It is suggested that a central use made of the device is to generate affiliation.

KW - Affiliation

KW - Concurrent Response

KW - Conversation

KW - Direct Reported Speech

KW - Institutional Talk

KW - Recipient's Response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002151672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.505

DO - 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.505

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 505

EP - 537

JO - Text and Talk

JF - Text and Talk

SN - 1860-7330

IS - 4

ER -