Abstract
This paper challenges the idea that the Lancastrian regime of the late 1450s was distinctive for its reliance, from the midlands, on the principality of Wales and the palatinate of Chester. The common emphasis on its association with Cheshire is a product of the late sixteenth century, and, beyond that, contemporary and near-contemporary perceptions even of a link with the midlands were limited. When the court moved to the midlands in 1456 the resources of the principality and earldom were far from easily accessible, and even thereafter the efforts made to draw on them were limited in their ambition and impact. Financial flows to the regime were restricted, and the political networks established, especially in the North and in Cheshire, were limited and highly dependent on the Stanleys. By 1459–60, therefore, the regime found little to rely on there, and the Yorkists were able to supplant them with relative ease.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 382-404 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Medieval History |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 25 Apr 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 May 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lancastrian rule and the resources of the prince of Wales, 1456-61'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Tim Thornton
- Vice-Chancellor's Office - Deputy Vice-Chancellor
- School of Arts and Humanities
- Department of Communication & Humanities - Professor of History
- Centre for History, Culture and Memory
- Centre for Health Histories - Member
Person: Academic