8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conversation analysis is used to examine a collection of sequences involving playful turns that are not immediately explicitly framed as laughable through laughter. Rather, laughter by the same speaker occurs after or in overlap with the recipient's response. Elements of the turns contribute to their playfulness, such as using exaggerated, formal and colloquial language. However, they are ambivalent in that they also do serious work. Many are first pair parts such as questions. Sacks (1992, p. 627) pointed out that non-serious first pair parts can be responded to with laughter, and thus not treated as having the sequential implications they might otherwise have. But in this collection responses align with serious sequential implications while sometimes simultaneously acknowledging and contributing to their playfulness. Laughter following or in overlap with the response then explicitly frames first turns (and, to an extent, the pair) as playful. However, its role in aligning with the just prior turn is often ambiguous, raising questions about the relationship of turns in this sequence. In general the analysis supports consideration of how playfulness is constructed and responded to in talk and of a technical understanding of the phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-102
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume100
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

humor
interaction
colloquial
conversation analysis
recipient
Laughter
Interaction
language
Overlap

Cite this

@article{ad1a8067430c4d3584bc970ff241d233,
title = "Laughter at Last: Playfulness and laughter in interaction",
abstract = "Conversation analysis is used to examine a collection of sequences involving playful turns that are not immediately explicitly framed as laughable through laughter. Rather, laughter by the same speaker occurs after or in overlap with the recipient's response. Elements of the turns contribute to their playfulness, such as using exaggerated, formal and colloquial language. However, they are ambivalent in that they also do serious work. Many are first pair parts such as questions. Sacks (1992, p. 627) pointed out that non-serious first pair parts can be responded to with laughter, and thus not treated as having the sequential implications they might otherwise have. But in this collection responses align with serious sequential implications while sometimes simultaneously acknowledging and contributing to their playfulness. Laughter following or in overlap with the response then explicitly frames first turns (and, to an extent, the pair) as playful. However, its role in aligning with the just prior turn is often ambiguous, raising questions about the relationship of turns in this sequence. In general the analysis supports consideration of how playfulness is constructed and responded to in talk and of a technical understanding of the phenomenon.",
keywords = "Conversation analysis, Interaction, Laughter, Non-seriousness, Playfulness",
author = "Elizabeth Holt",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.012",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "89--102",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Laughter at Last : Playfulness and laughter in interaction. / Holt, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 100, 2016, p. 89-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laughter at Last

T2 - Playfulness and laughter in interaction

AU - Holt, Elizabeth

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Conversation analysis is used to examine a collection of sequences involving playful turns that are not immediately explicitly framed as laughable through laughter. Rather, laughter by the same speaker occurs after or in overlap with the recipient's response. Elements of the turns contribute to their playfulness, such as using exaggerated, formal and colloquial language. However, they are ambivalent in that they also do serious work. Many are first pair parts such as questions. Sacks (1992, p. 627) pointed out that non-serious first pair parts can be responded to with laughter, and thus not treated as having the sequential implications they might otherwise have. But in this collection responses align with serious sequential implications while sometimes simultaneously acknowledging and contributing to their playfulness. Laughter following or in overlap with the response then explicitly frames first turns (and, to an extent, the pair) as playful. However, its role in aligning with the just prior turn is often ambiguous, raising questions about the relationship of turns in this sequence. In general the analysis supports consideration of how playfulness is constructed and responded to in talk and of a technical understanding of the phenomenon.

AB - Conversation analysis is used to examine a collection of sequences involving playful turns that are not immediately explicitly framed as laughable through laughter. Rather, laughter by the same speaker occurs after or in overlap with the recipient's response. Elements of the turns contribute to their playfulness, such as using exaggerated, formal and colloquial language. However, they are ambivalent in that they also do serious work. Many are first pair parts such as questions. Sacks (1992, p. 627) pointed out that non-serious first pair parts can be responded to with laughter, and thus not treated as having the sequential implications they might otherwise have. But in this collection responses align with serious sequential implications while sometimes simultaneously acknowledging and contributing to their playfulness. Laughter following or in overlap with the response then explicitly frames first turns (and, to an extent, the pair) as playful. However, its role in aligning with the just prior turn is often ambiguous, raising questions about the relationship of turns in this sequence. In general the analysis supports consideration of how playfulness is constructed and responded to in talk and of a technical understanding of the phenomenon.

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Interaction

KW - Laughter

KW - Non-seriousness

KW - Playfulness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971613907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.012

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 89

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -