Leadership: A Categorical Mistake?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As growing numbers of scholars become disaffected by the research traditions laid down by leadership psychology, there is a steady turn towards treating leadership as a discursive phenomenon. In response, leadership researchers are increasingly adopting interpretive and observational methods in the search for the practices of leadership in everyday life. This article suggests that while there are many advantages to an interest in discourse and action, there are also many subtle difficulties in making leadership observable and knowable in the field. Taking Louis Pondy's notion of leadership as a language-game as its starting point, this article argues that leadership studies as a discipline suffers from a persistent category mistake; a category mistake that some recent interpretive studies of leadership reveal, but inadvertently reproduce in the search for leadership's essential character. Instead, this article takes Pondy's thesis to its logical conclusion and outlines a programme of research that confronts this category mistake, whilst demonstrating the potential for, and limitations of, treating leadership as a language-game.
LanguageEnglish
Pages763-782
Number of pages20
JournalHuman Relations
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

leadership
Mistakes
Categorical
language
everyday life
psychology
discourse
Category Mistake

Cite this

Kelly, Simon. / Leadership : A Categorical Mistake?. In: Human Relations. 2008 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 763-782.
@article{baccc52cbb864da6a6668907b9461e92,
title = "Leadership: A Categorical Mistake?",
abstract = "As growing numbers of scholars become disaffected by the research traditions laid down by leadership psychology, there is a steady turn towards treating leadership as a discursive phenomenon. In response, leadership researchers are increasingly adopting interpretive and observational methods in the search for the practices of leadership in everyday life. This article suggests that while there are many advantages to an interest in discourse and action, there are also many subtle difficulties in making leadership observable and knowable in the field. Taking Louis Pondy's notion of leadership as a language-game as its starting point, this article argues that leadership studies as a discipline suffers from a persistent category mistake; a category mistake that some recent interpretive studies of leadership reveal, but inadvertently reproduce in the search for leadership's essential character. Instead, this article takes Pondy's thesis to its logical conclusion and outlines a programme of research that confronts this category mistake, whilst demonstrating the potential for, and limitations of, treating leadership as a language-game.",
keywords = "action, category mistake, ethnography, ethnomethodology, language-games, leadership",
author = "Simon Kelly",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726708092403",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "763--782",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Leadership : A Categorical Mistake? / Kelly, Simon.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 61, No. 6, 01.06.2008, p. 763-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leadership

T2 - Human Relations

AU - Kelly, Simon

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - As growing numbers of scholars become disaffected by the research traditions laid down by leadership psychology, there is a steady turn towards treating leadership as a discursive phenomenon. In response, leadership researchers are increasingly adopting interpretive and observational methods in the search for the practices of leadership in everyday life. This article suggests that while there are many advantages to an interest in discourse and action, there are also many subtle difficulties in making leadership observable and knowable in the field. Taking Louis Pondy's notion of leadership as a language-game as its starting point, this article argues that leadership studies as a discipline suffers from a persistent category mistake; a category mistake that some recent interpretive studies of leadership reveal, but inadvertently reproduce in the search for leadership's essential character. Instead, this article takes Pondy's thesis to its logical conclusion and outlines a programme of research that confronts this category mistake, whilst demonstrating the potential for, and limitations of, treating leadership as a language-game.

AB - As growing numbers of scholars become disaffected by the research traditions laid down by leadership psychology, there is a steady turn towards treating leadership as a discursive phenomenon. In response, leadership researchers are increasingly adopting interpretive and observational methods in the search for the practices of leadership in everyday life. This article suggests that while there are many advantages to an interest in discourse and action, there are also many subtle difficulties in making leadership observable and knowable in the field. Taking Louis Pondy's notion of leadership as a language-game as its starting point, this article argues that leadership studies as a discipline suffers from a persistent category mistake; a category mistake that some recent interpretive studies of leadership reveal, but inadvertently reproduce in the search for leadership's essential character. Instead, this article takes Pondy's thesis to its logical conclusion and outlines a programme of research that confronts this category mistake, whilst demonstrating the potential for, and limitations of, treating leadership as a language-game.

KW - action

KW - category mistake

KW - ethnography

KW - ethnomethodology

KW - language-games

KW - leadership

U2 - 10.1177/0018726708092403

DO - 10.1177/0018726708092403

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 763

EP - 782

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 6

ER -